Search for: "Does 1-10" Results 9361 - 9380 of 41,681
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2019, 7:37 am by Rob Robinson
ComplexDiscovery anonymizes responses to this survey and does not share any individual or organizational contact data, demographics or answers. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 12:19 pm by michael
  Instead, they’ll merely pass a 1 year extension of 2009’s rates and exemptions through 2010 thus allowing the FET to drop down to $1 million per person in 2011 with an additional 10% added on to the applicable rate per the existing law. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:25 pm by Robert Guest
Really, we won’t guarantee a result, and if a lawyer does, that’s a sign they are shady and you shouldn’t hire them. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:04 pm by Bill Marler
The fact is, this stuff is more problematic than it was just 10 years ago. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:25 pm by Robert Guest
Really, we won’t guarantee a result, and if a lawyer does, that’s a sign they are shady and you shouldn’t hire them. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:28 pm by Cathy Siegner
The reported cases are in Arizona (10), California (31), Illinois (1), Mississippi (1), New Mexico (6), South Dakota (1), Virginia (1), Washington (1), and Wisconsin (1). [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:26 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The unconventional format of claims 1 and 18, likewise, does not preclude the claims from being definite. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 6:12 am by Patricia Klusmeyer
The delay does not affect the other conditions of the BIC exemption, which continue to be scheduled for implementation on January 1, 2018. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 9:53 pm
A member who does not comply with this requirement within six months of his or her appointment is considered to have resigned from the commission. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 11:07 am by Anthony Zaller
Revise grooming standards to comply with CROWN Act and ensure that the policy does not discriminate against natural hairstyles. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 9:30 am by Don Cruse
Feb. 17, 2012 1 decision (signed) Yes (2-day) Feb. 10, 2012 1 decision (signed) No Jan. 27, 2012 3 decisions (1 signed) Yes (2-day) Dec. 16, 2011 11 decisions (3 signed) Yes (2-day) Nov. 28, 2011 1 decision (signed) No Nov. 18, 2011 1 decision (signed) Yes (2-day) Oct. 21, 2011 6 decisions (1 signed) Yes (2-day) Sep. 30, 2011 None Yes (2-day) All but two opinions have been issued on the Friday following a conference. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Department of Labor announced five new opinion letters that address compliance issues related to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA): FLSA2020-6: Addresses whether salespeople who travel to different locations to sell products using their employer’s mobile assets qualify for the outside sales exemption under FLSA section 13(a)(1); FLSA2020-7: Addresses whether an automobile manufacturer’s direct payments to an automobile dealership’s employee, compensating the employee for… [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Here’s the results from our recent survey on compensation committee minutes & consultants: 1. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 10:58 am by Renae Lloyd
Fortunately, FINRA does provide for an arbitration forum for investors to resolve such disputes. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 10:34 am by Rob Robinson
ComplexDiscovery anonymizes responses to this survey and does not share any individual or organizational contact data, demographics or answers. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 5:00 am by J. Robert Brown
  It does not deal with severance packages paid to departing CEOs in non-change of control situations. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:15 am by Eugene Volokh
§ 10-204a(a).[1] There is no serious or reasonable dispute as to the State's broad authority to require and regulate immunizations for children: the law is clear that the State of Connecticut may create, eliminate or suspend the religious exemption in Section 10-204a(a) in accordance with its well-settled power to protect public safety and health. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 3:40 am
If the same standard of knowledge is required for 512(c)(1)(A)(i) as for (ii), what purpose does (ii) serve? [read post]