Search for: "Chambers v. State"
Results 921 - 940
of 4,896
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2010, 2:33 pm
Supreme Court yesterday issued its first signed decision of the term in Abbott v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 5:18 am
Seated in the front row of the circular-shaped courtroom stacked with seventeen appointed judges from seventeen of the Council of Europe member states, I watched it happen. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 pm
Latest Regulatory Decisions Latest decisions of the Scottish Information Commissioner: Latest Decision Notices from the Information Commissioner’s Office: Latest decisions of the First-tier Tribunal, General Regulatory Chamber [Information Rights] John Cross v IC EA/2010/0101. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 12:09 pm
Maruko v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm
Illinois v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:04 am
On March 2, 2011, the Supreme Court established in Snyder v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 7:38 am
Chambers et al – United States District Court – Eastern District of Louisiana – April 17th, 2019) involves a motor vehicle accident between an automobile and a tractor-trailer. [read post]
15 May 2008, 4:38 am
Here is a "brief chambers opinion" from Judge Newman: Bennett, petitioner v. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 8:50 am
We are very grateful to Alice Irving of Doughty Street Chambers for the following note of a judgment in the Administrative Court on an application for interim relief. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:54 am
United States v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 11:05 am
The Oregon Court of Appeals reversed the Oregon State Board of Nursing (OSBN) in the case of Shank v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:21 pm
Parts are "common" if they are for shared, rather than individual benefit: Marfield Properties v Secretary of State for the Environment [1996] SCLR 749. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:21 pm
Parts are "common" if they are for shared, rather than individual benefit: Marfield Properties v Secretary of State for the Environment [1996] SCLR 749. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Motion for leave to file and amicus brief of DRI - The Voice of the Defense Bar Motion for leave to file and amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 4:58 am
Diane Webber, a British lawyer who recently did a lengthy study of detention law in a variety of countries, writes in with the following account of the European Court of Human Rights decision earlier this month in Hassan v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:30 pm
Creative Internet Advertising Corp. v. [read post]
