Search for: "DAVIS v. DAVIS" Results 921 - 940 of 8,997
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2021, 4:46 pm
Davies, Collection of the Most Important Cases Respecting Patents of Invention and the Rights of Patentees 442 (1816); see Hayne v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 7:34 am by Eugene Volokh
The final Rule uses a definition of discriminatory "sexual harassment" that closely tracks this Court's definition of that term in Davis v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 2:24 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
In Chapter 22, Alan Durant and Jennifer Davis explain how linguistics may be applied in IP research: for instance, in judicial interpretation of certain legal terms, or in examining the distinctiveness of certain verbal signs. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 6:34 am by INFORRM
The Claimant succeeded in her libel claim in Terri Ann Davies v Gavin Paul Carter [2021] EWHC 3021 (QB). [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 6:30 am by ernst
Their arguments (which anticipated those made in Brown v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
” On 8 to 10 November 2021, Saini J heard the trial in the harassment and libel case of Davies v Carter, judgment was reserved and will be handed down on 15 November 2021. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm by Laura Welborn
” In a working paper, Steven Salop, professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, and several coauthors discussed the impacts of Ohio v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 11:50 am by Unreported Opinions
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Manufacturing cocaine A jury in the Circuit Court for Wicomico County convicted Keone Davis, appellant, of possession with intent to distribute cocaine, manufacturing cocaine, possession of equipment for manufacturing cocaine, keeping a common nuisance, possession of cocaine, possession of buprenorphine naloxone (Suboxone), and possession of drug paraphernalia. ... [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
On 10 November 2021 the UK Supreme Court will had down the long awaited judgment in Lloyd v Google. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 12:10 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
” Although the Court has held that the Brecht test “subsumes” § 2254(d)(1)’s requirements, the Court declared in Davis v. [read post]