Search for: "General Products Corp" Results 921 - 940 of 6,602
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2017, 1:28 pm
Marie-Andree Weiss of The 1709 Blog discusses the Paramount Pictures Corp. v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 12:37 pm by John L. Welch
Does this suggest that the PTO Examining Corps needs a refresher course in the difference between de facto and de jure functionality? [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 12:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Among other things, Defendants’ counsel sent a letter to Cap Export’s customer 4Moda Corp. and to Amazon. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 6:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
UAV Corp., 517 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir. 2008), an alleged misrepresentation of patent status isn’t covered by the Lanham Act. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 8:11 pm by Alex Gasser
On December 2, 2011, Standard Innovation Corporation of Canada and Standard Innovation (US) Corp. of Wilmington, Delaware (collectively, “Standard Innovation”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 10:00 pm
We're thinking again about Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
”[7] Starting with Section 388 is excellent, but the majority studiously ignored the rich commentary and case law that addresses this general duty in the context of sales of products to intermediaries. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:46 pm by Wally Zimolong
DGS requires at least three (3) manufacturers of an available product to be specified, but bidders may use equal products/manufacturers as approved by the Professional, as per the General Conditions to the Construction Contract. [read post]