Search for: "In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge" Results 921 - 940 of 1,632
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
As Judge Thomas warned, the logic of the majority decision in Keller “jeopardizes the creative use of historic figures in motion pictures, books, and sound recordings. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:48 pm
  In the first five months after its feeble re-do, we did not see cases considering whether to extend Weeks. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 1:00 pm by Hanni Fakhoury
From NSA to DEA The government didn’t disclose this information in a report or in response to a congressional inquiry. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
   Procedural HistoryThe basic dispute in this case concerns the meaning of the words “molecular weight” as those words appear in a patent claim. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:25 am by Dennis Crouch
  But it’s one that leaves CAFC judges ample room to defer (or not) in any given case. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 1:53 pm
  In In re BankAmerica Corporation Securities Litigation (Oetting v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
“The state of mind of the accused infringer is notrelevant to this objective inquiry. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Part II briefly touches on the political background for the judicial regulatory measures discussed, with particular attention to a series of governmental inquiries beginning in the 1970s that served to sharpen public scrutiny of the legal profession. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 12:38 pm by Schachtman
Wells was and remains representative of what is possible and results when trial judges ignore the constraints of study validity. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 10:29 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Judge Sleet found issues with four of the five Cubist patents related to daptomycin.As to the '967 patent:The court notes initially that several of Cubist's counterarguments as to whythe Woodworm article does not anticipate are more appropriately directed at anobviousness inquiry. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
 There’s a limit to what we can recommend that defendants do ahead of time, but any sort of generalized second-guessing of defense compliance and data management is directly contrary to fundamental discovery principles that every federal judge, by now, undoubtedly knows about (and most have probably cited).Don’t be shy about telling the Court what to expect from the other side, and why they’re doing it. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:57 pm by Lucy Reed
The evidence related to the father’s dishonest evidence within proceedings concerning his interest in a company. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 8:06 am by Ron Coleman
There are some other good, feisty comments on John’s blog here, too, but they’re all anonymous. [read post]