Search for: "People v. Richard" Results 921 - 940 of 3,258
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2023, 11:22 am by Giles Peaker
(Jakimaviciute) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC (2014) EWCA Civ 1438 (our note) and Richards LJ’s view that The disqualification effected by (the council’s policy) is fundamentally at odds with the requirement under section 166A(3)(b) of the 1996 Act to frame a scheme so as to secure that reasonable preference is given to people who are owed a housing duty under one of the provisions of Part VII. [read post]
24 May 2007, 1:09 am
NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal PracticeCourt Finds Defendant's Love Letters Not Intended To Harass; Harassment Charges Is Dismissed People v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
On the subject generally, see also Richard Schragger, What is “Government” “Speech”? [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 2:39 am by INFORRM
Professor Grayling’s barrister Richard Munden told the court: “Allegations of paedophilia, including of possessing and storing child pornography, are undoubtedly some of the most serious allegations that can be levelled at anyone in the modern age … The allegation is all the more damaging in respect of those who work with young people, and who regularly visit schools to talk to schoolchildren about their futures – as does Professor Grayling”… [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:11 pm by John Floyd
The wealth of the industry is, and has historically been, built on the backs of poor people (most often people of color) charged with a crime. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 9:02 am by Lyle Denniston
” With a verbal blast at another federal judge, Seventh Circuit Judge Richard A. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 8:40 pm by Kedar
The role of lead government litigator is a difficult one but could be done by a wide variety of people considering the caliber of attorney staffing the OSG. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post, Seung Min Kim and Robert Barnes report that “Kavanaugh’s years-old remarks questioning the landmark ruling that forced President Richard M. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Supreme Court declared that anti-mixed marriage statutes were unconstitutional, in the landmark civil rights case Loving v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary continues on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]