Search for: "U.S. v. Richards" Results 921 - 940 of 5,037
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed at The Regulatory Review, Richard Revesz argues that the solicitor general’s arguments in Seila Law v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
What happens when the President simply thinks that he is not merely above the law but that, in Richard Nixon’s infamous words, “when the President does it, that means it is not illegal” at all? [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
[From Louisiana State University law professor Ed Richards.] [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 4 and 5 February 2020 the Court of Appeal (Etherton MR, David Richards and Coulson LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Canada Goose Retail v Persons Unknown. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 5:09 pm by Bruce Zagaris
The current issue of the IELR will discuss the case in more detail. [1]    Richard Blumenthal v. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 5:09 pm by Bruce Zagaris
The current issue of the IELR will discuss the case in more detail. [1]    Richard Blumenthal v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am by Jeh Johnson
So today my remarks will focus on war powers—specifically the president’s ability to commit the U.S. armed forces into some level of hostilities without congressional authorization. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm by Elliot Setzer, William Ford
Richard Brown, the commander of naval surface forces for U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 11:56 am by Leah Litman and Steve Vladeck
The U.S. solicitor general blithely suggests that the court’s cases have apparently taken a new direction. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Facebook has settled a lawsuit over facial recognition technology, agreeing to pay $550m (£419m) over accusations it had broken an Illinois state law regulating the use of biometric details in one of the largest consumer privacy settlements in U.S. history. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:45 am by Jonathan Shaub
George Washington, for example, withheld some sensitive diplomatic letters between the U.S. minister to France and the French government because the information they contained, if disclosed, could adversely affect the relationship between the U.S. and France. [read post]