Search for: "United States v. Scott" Results 921 - 940 of 2,722
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2010, 8:11 am by Howard Wasserman
Notice Pleading Restoration Act, S. 1504, 111th Cong. (2009): “Except as otherwise expressly provided by an Act of Congress or by an amendment to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which takes effect after the date of enactment of this Act, a Federal court shall not dismiss a complaint under rule 12(b)(6) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, except under the standards set forth by the Supreme Court of the United States in Conley v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 7:50 am by Scott Bomboy
Justice Anthony Kennedy didn’t take part in State of Washington v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 1:16 pm by John Floyd
Supreme Court gave us Dred Scott, and state legislatures gave us Jim Crow. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:42 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Hovenkamp ("[P]otential [patent] defendants can do better by forming a litigation cost-sharing agreement: a contractual agreement that divides a member's defense costs among the group when the plaintiff is a PAE, and which requires members to litigate predatory claims to judgment.")The Failed Promise of User Fees: Empirical Evidence from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, by Michael Frakes & Melissa F. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 7:45 am by Schachtman
United States, 929 F.2d 1235, 1239 (8th Cir. 1991), decided before the Supreme Court decided Daubert.) [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 6:12 pm
The case that made it to the Supreme Court which ultimately led to its overturning is United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 12:28 pm
Hall, “a free citizen of this state,” because three prosecution witnesses were Chinese. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
Sec. 337(a), only the United States can enforce the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 2:16 pm by Amy Howe
In a sketch depicting last week’s oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:16 am
Scott Pierce Requirement under subsection 102(f) of Title 35 of the United States Code that a person “himself invent the subject matter sought to be patented” has been removed by the Leahy-Smith American Invents Act (AIA) of 2011. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:20 pm by Adam Wagner
The Trust argued that the reasoning in Osman v United Kingdom (23452/94) (1999) 1 FLR 193 ECHR was not applicable to the care of hospital patients. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
” Counting to 5 (podcast) features a discussion of Epic Systems v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 5:04 am by David Oscar Markus
United States, which decided that police are allowed to use minor vehicle infractions as a pretext to initiate traffic stops with the goal of investigating other possible unrelated crimes.According to an analysis of over 100 million traffic stops, Black drivers are about 40 percent more likely to be pulled over than their white counterparts. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am by INFORRM
“ On the issue of the “superinjunction” the judgment cited the central cases concerning open justice including Scott v Scott, A-G v Leveller and ex parte Kaim Todner. [read post]