Search for: "United States v. Sharpe"
Results 921 - 940
of 1,471
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2013, 11:33 am
On July 1, 2013, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued an order (pdf) granting, in part, Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys fees in Wild Equity Institute v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 10:52 am
Crazy.So when I saw that this opinion was about someone who'd been prosecuted by the U.S. military, and then by the United States, I thought: "Oh. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:34 am
On Wednesday, June 26, he shared his strong disagreement with the majority’s ruling striking down a portion of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:51 pm
This well-settled principle is common to the United States and India. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm
Sharpe, 347 U. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:57 am
Supreme Court held, resolving a circuit court split and rejecting the EEOC’s guidance on the matter (Vance v Ball State University, June 24, 2013, Alito, S, Jr). [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
The Facts in Vance v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
Congress responded by prohibiting the transfer or release of Guantánamo detainees to the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:56 pm
United States, we got as close to unanimity as the week allowed. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
In Arizona v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Introduction What is the proper scope of state power and its agent the public lawyer in Criminal law? [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Introduction What is the proper scope of state power and its agent the public lawyer in Criminal law? [read post]
28 May 2013, 7:29 pm
And keep in mind the lemon law definitions in your state. [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:05 am
Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd., [2002] EWCA Civ 605, [2002] 3 All E.R. 385 (holding that copying does not invalidate a court’s decision); id. at para. 41 (citing United States v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:00 am
That is, Congress should state explicitly that detention authority under the AUMF and the NDAA does not extend to any persons captured within the territory of the United States. [read post]
20 May 2013, 7:57 am
United States v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 2:00 pm
The fallout The Administration has drawn sharp criticism over the subpoenas. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:57 am
Next Thursday, the Supreme Court will decide whether or not to grant certiorari in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 7:30 am
United States. [read post]
