Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 9381 - 9400 of 21,692
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2016, 1:25 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Stated otherwise, the duty imposed upon a municipality when it undertakes to act in loco parentis is nondelegable (see Bartels v County of Westchester, 76 AD2d 517, 523). [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:00 pm by MBettman
On February 4, 2015 the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in State of Ohio v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 8:30 am by UK Supreme Court Yearbook
’ The Rt Hon Sir Jack Beatson FBA, ‘The New Model Judiciary and the Other Two Branches of State’ The Hon Justice Mark Leeming, ‘Ministerial Override Certificates and the Law/Fact Distinction – A Comparison Between Australia and the United Kingdom’ Philip Cayford QC, ‘Wyatt v Vince – Climate Change in the Family Division? [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 7:58 am by Mark Astarita
., Rockville, MarylandKyle Hauptman, Executive Director of the Main Street Growth Project, Washington, D.C.Jenny Kassan, owner, Jenny Kassan Consulting, Fremont, CaliforniaCatherine V. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 6:52 am
  As you would expect if you read the title or had analyzed the trends of when we post about food cases, Arnold v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm by Ron Coleman
What Mark does is absolutely allowed under U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
Urban Distilleries Inc., 2014 FC 833, the Court granted summary judgment that two section 9 marks were unenforceable. [read post]