Search for: "Doe 35"
Results 9421 - 9440
of 17,232
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2018, 3:55 am
Affirm that their employer does not tolerate any form of harassment, abuse of power, and/or discrimination. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:04 am
Americans understand, as does Allstate, that diversity is a part of the American dream. [read post]
24 May 2017, 3:48 am
“Judge below” data do not include Rule 35 reductions either. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:11 am
The widow, if any, should contact the Capron & Avgerinos firm that does good work out of Chicago, Illinois. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 7:00 am
Deribarii (delivery) does not sound right.) [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 11:11 am
Further, the Court found that 35 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 5:58 am
The IRS does what Congress tells them. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm
This outcome, though, does illustrate what a sham the order has turned out to be in practice. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 5:37 am
The PTAB found the claims to be patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 9:00 pm
A $100 deduction lowers taxes by $35 for someone in the 35% bracket, but only $15 for someone in the 15% bracket. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:29 am
Type of Income 2012 (Pre-Expiration of the Bush-era tax cuts) 2013 (Post-Expiration of the Bush-era tax cuts) 2013 (Adding the new Medicare Surtax) Earned Income 35% 39.6% 40.5%* Taxable Interest 35% 39.6% 43.4% Dividends 15% 39.6% 43.4% Capital Gains 15% 20.0% 23.8% * This figure does not include the already existing Medicare surtax on wages (1.45% paid by employee) or self-employment income (2.9%). [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 2:39 pm
Four among its eighty-one recommendations fall under the heading “Discovery”, including a proposal for a “best practice” that does not end up adopted as such in the new rules. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 4:57 pm
Obviousness under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 1:22 am
Clause 35 of the CCM abolishes the ‘penalty by consent’ where a respondent admits misconduct. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:50 am
Economic Crime: Does Personality Matter? [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:09 am
” Not to mention adding 35 years to his sentence. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 10:00 am
Attorneys are often left to throw up their hands when asked whether a new invention is patentable or whether an existing patent will likely withstand a patent eligibility challenge under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:25 am
For example, an employee's 35-year-old daughter might have a complicated pregnancy and childbirth. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 11:48 am
§ 120 and 37 CFR1.78(a)(1) – (a)(3) for prior nonprovisional applications and 35 U.S.C.119(e) and 37 CFR1.78(a)(4) – (a)(6) for provisional applications. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 9:48 pm
As Major J. stated in Athey: the defendant is liable for the additional damage but not the pre-existing damage: at para. 35. [read post]
