Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE" Results 9421 - 9440 of 30,503
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2012, 1:19 pm by Susan Brenner
McDaniel, supra.On July 1, 2010, Hatfield was arrested and “charged with twenty counts of possession of child pornography in violation of state law. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 4:00 am by Christopher J. Willis
Supreme Court granted certiorari in First American Financial Corporation v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
” To hold otherwise, the appellate court stated, would be to recognize, contrary to public policy favoring settlement and fair dealing, that the husband was entitled to a “fair” opportunity to stall in settling the action with the goal of retaining all of the marital assets upon the wife’s death. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:21 am by Adam Wagner
The following is taken from the court’s press release: No breach of right to fair trial The Court recalled that the right to report matters stated in open court was not a civil right. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:34 pm by SJM
A fair balance had not been struck and there was a breach of A1P1. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:34 pm by SJM
A fair balance had not been struck and there was a breach of A1P1. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 7:06 am
  The case tests the scope of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act, when compared to a state law that seeks to provide greater privacy for consumer data. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:55 pm by Tammy Binford
Source: AmberLaneRoberts / iStock / Getty The Court’s June 4 ruling in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:55 pm by Tammy Binford
Source: AmberLaneRoberts / iStock / Getty The Court’s June 4 ruling in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:21 am by David A. Moss
Note: In California, the ACLU has launched a campaign to get elected officials to enact sentencing reform as they strive to resolve the state's budget crisis and implement the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:27 pm by SJM
The Court found that the State had failed to strike a fair balance in each of the cases by placing an excessive burden on the applicants and found an A1P1 violation. [read post]