Search for: "STATE v COUNTS"
Results 9441 - 9460
of 17,260
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2013, 2:34 pm
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In Seaton v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 12:13 pm
The United States Constitution guarantees the right to trial by a jury of one's peers. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
Last month, in Elane Photography v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 8:02 pm
Due to shipping considerations, only United States addresses, please. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 2:46 pm
Kesselheim focused primarily on the Second Circuit’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 12:46 pm
The court found Monster had standing and the matter was ripe and found that Monster stated a claim on all counts except void for vagueness and commercial speech. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 12:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 7:58 am
Federal agencies are starting to stake out their positions following the Supreme Court's decision in U.S. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 5:51 am
AC34655 - State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 1:24 pm
Olson was acquitted on July 1, 2013 of all thirteen counts of vandalism, which could have resulted in thirteen years in prison or fines of $13,000. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:14 am
United States v Harper, Department of Revenue of Montana v Kurth Ranch, Cordero v Lalor, and United States v Ursery settled that a sanction in a "civil" or non-criminal proceeding may constitute punishment for double jeopardy purposes. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 3:52 pm
State (SC11-903) and Williams v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 11:42 am
Decision: Rutolo v Northey [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 9:26 am
Logtale, Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 9:19 am
In its complaint, patent attorneys for NIBCO ask the court for: Count I: Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement Count II: Declaratory Judgment of Invalidity of the Patents-In-SuitPractice Tip: In MedImmune v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 8:29 am
Salinas v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:16 am
Nevertheless, the HR Policy Association points out that the preamble to the Sec. 503 regulations allows an employer to avoid inquiries and “count an individual as ‘disabled’ if the disability is ‘obvious’ or ‘known’ to the employer. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 2:35 pm
The Treasury issued a Revenue Ruling today that sets out the rules that will guide the government in handling interpretation of the tax code regarding "marriage" and "husband" or "wife" or "spouse" in respect of same-sex married couples after the Supreme Court's historic DOMA decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 12:38 pm
Butler v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 12:03 pm
Unfortunately, a domestic partnership or civil union created in this state does not count for federal benefit purposes. [read post]
