Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 9461 - 9480
of 14,201
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2012, 3:07 pm
V. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:05 pm
Again this was for the sole purpose to demonstrate to the jury that Petitioner was in close proximity to the crime scene. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:02 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:18 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 9:51 pm
United States (thermal imaging of a home to detect heat consistent with marijuana grow operation was a search for Fourth Amendment purposes). [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 3:22 pm
Unite Here, 601 F. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:45 am
While in the United States, [Diamreyan] made no effort to obtain legitimate employment or to advance his education; instead, he continued his involvement in the scheme to defraud.Brief for the United States of America, U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:43 am
The Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 2:52 pm
The following contribution to our Kiobel v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:42 pm
United States, , 389 U.S. 347, 88 S.Ct. 507 (1967); the statements in this piece are not affected by the property analysis in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Raw Text of Opinion UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MACKLE VINCENT SHELTON, Petitioner, v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:13 am
In Aizkir Navigation Inc v Al Wathba National Insurance [2011] EWHC 3940 (Comm), the High Court considered a principle of contractual construction and held that a clause stating that claims "be settled in accordance with English Law and practice shall be so settled in Abu Dhabi (UAE)" amounted to an exclusive jurisdiction clause in favour of the United Arab Emirates (the UAE) and there was no overwhelming reason to displace that jurisdiction clause.The Claimant,… [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:30 pm
An “Officer of the United States” within the meaning of the Appointments Clause, is not simply an “employee,” but is a person who “exercise[s] significant authority pursuant to the laws of the United States. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:28 pm
The case is UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:21 pm
” United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 10:02 am
The well known United Supreme Court case of State Farm v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:24 am
All plaintiffs in this case have been legally authorized to reside and work in the United States for many years. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:58 am
The following contribution to our Kiobel v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:52 am
Taking the United States as ” the paradigm of a mature federal union”, the judge continued, it would be surprising if constitutional or federal law in the United States could legitimately require one state of the Union, before, for example, extraditing a citizen to another State of the Union, to satisfy itself that the sister State would not treat the citizen inconsistently with his or her rights under the Constitution.… [read post]
