Search for: "State v. Read" Results 9481 - 9500 of 64,470
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2024, 7:38 am by Ana Muñoz and Niamh Gibbons
As we recently wrote, states’ firearms regulations have faced legal challenges across the country since the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 6:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: cert-petition-2.pdf Question presented: Whether the Tenth Circuit panel violated the current jurisprudence of this Court and the Congressional policy underlying IGRA by precluding the Nation from exercising its sovereign authority to permit a patron’s tort claim against the Nation and its gaming facility to be brought in state court without express congressional permission. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 6:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: cert-petition-2.pdf Question presented: Whether the Tenth Circuit panel violated the current jurisprudence of this Court and the Congressional policy underlying IGRA by precluding the Nation from exercising its sovereign authority to permit a patron’s tort claim against the Nation and its gaming facility to be brought in state court without express congressional permission. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 4:34 pm by Kevin Sheerin
  It stated when only equitable relief or, in other words, reinstated is sought there is no Notice of Claim requirement. see Matter of Sheil v Melucci, 94 AD3d 766 The Notice of Claim requirement is contatined in Education Law 3813 (1). [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 10:07 pm by Jason Shinn
Turning to the particular case (Cardoni v Prosperity Bank), Prosperity Bank is a Texas-based bank. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 12:33 pm by MBettman
Background On October 30, 2013, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 1:34 pm
I’m delighted to say that the Nebraska Supreme Court has just agreed to review State v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 10:28 am by lennyesq
  The New York State Court of Appeals’ recent decision in Matter of Michael D’Angelo v Nicholas Scoppetta serves as an important reminder that the term “reprimand” may be interpreted more broadly than public employers anticipate. [read post]