Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 9521 - 9540
of 13,942
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2012, 10:23 am
Marshals Service; the Drug Enforcement Administration; and the Jackson County Sheriff's Office. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:23 am
He is a former administrative patent judge on the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s decision in Royal Brush Manufacturing v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 2:45 pm
Effective July 10, pursuant to this administrative memorandum, probation officers are directed not to seek ordinary extensions outside of a hearing before the court. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 11:51 pm
In Chalimoniuk v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 7:41 am
In Iacono v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 8:06 pm
In Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
The Supreme Court split, however, on what the appropriate standard for assessing the existence of a duty, vel non, in maritime law, where the federal courts must act as common law courts in developing legal rules and principles. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:56 am
Chief Executive Officer Paul V. [read post]
26 May 2017, 4:24 pm
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit held in Bank Melli v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 8:56 am
By: Rachel V. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 11:52 am
Supreme Court announced that it would hear Baze v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 5:30 am
Update: Castaneda-Castillo v Holder (1st Cir. 2012) . [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am
,v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
In Buckley v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 12:55 pm
.'"] Lee v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 1:44 pm
I would observe that federal civil rights prosecutions have been rare in the current administration. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 5:50 pm
In Wills v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 5:46 am
See Diaz v. [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 6:00 am
Petitioner, who had been born deaf, appealed a decision by the New York State Division of Human Rights [DHR] dismissing her complaint that the New York State Office for People With Developmental Disabilities [OPWDD] had unlawfully discriminated against her in violation of New York State's Human Right's Law [[NYSHRL] when OPWDD rescinded its offer to employ Petitioner "because of her hearing loss without first offering her a reasonable accommodation".Citing Matter of… [read post]
