Search for: "Free v. State" Results 941 - 960 of 35,647
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2012, 10:00 am by law librarian
The law was challenged by American Tradition Partnership who contend that the law violates free speech and is invalidated by the [...] [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 6:40 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 42971 (ED AR, March 22, 2011), an Arkansas federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing plaintiff's claim that participation in the Therapeutic Community program as a condition to his parole violates the Establishment and Free Exercise clauses.In United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 4:24 am by Simon Lovegrove (UK)
On 10 December 2018, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) delivered the judgment for the case of Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (C-621/18), finding that the UK is free to revoke unilaterally the notification of its intention to withdraw from the EU. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:39 am
Given Pruneyard -- which, I get, was rendered in an era in which California courts were perhaps more strongly free speech oriented than today -- I think that the state court might well have been more solicitous of the state law constitutional claim than federal judges.Plaintiff can still take its shot in the United States Supreme Court, but I don't think that'll go anywhere. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Anna Price
Mockus for committing blasphemy during his lectures in State v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 4:57 pm by charley foster
(I've stored it on a free hosting service so it can be slow to open). [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 3:37 pm by Mark Edwin Burge
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 10:13 am by Bartolus
In its judgment in Case C-73/08 Nicolas Bressol and others v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 4:30 am by Howard Friedman
In a stipulation (full text) filed yesterday by the parties in Stormans Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:52 pm
A year after the Supreme Court decision in United States v Windsor, federal agencies have been issuing rules that affect same sex couples regarding programs like Social Security, Supplemental Security Income, Medicare, and Medicaid. [read post]