Search for: "Matter of Henderson" Results 941 - 960 of 1,080
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2014, 2:23 pm by Peter Hirtle
" The only thing that seems to matter is that the “permission to publish” form is signed. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 7:38 am
(Not that it makes much of a difference whether we call statutory interpretation federal common-lawmaking or something else—all that matters is that courts also have an inherent power to interpret words, however far that extends. [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:47 am by Jonathan Shaub
As an empirical matter, lawsuits have proved extremely ineffective and inefficient as a means of enforcing congressional oversight demands. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 4:15 pm by NL
The shortage of accommodation means that such difficult choices have to be made.Ms A issued a s.204 appeal on grounds that:The Respondent failed to make sufficient enquiry and failed to take relevant matters into account; The Respondent fettered its discretion and/or applied the wrong test; and The Respondent’s decision is Wednesbury unreasonable.Ms A asked the Court to substitute a decision that the property was not suitable.Waltham defended and said even if it found for Ms A, the… [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:50 am by Alex Phipps
The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded the matter to the trial court. [read post]
19 May 2009, 10:59 am
if not, again, i would gladly discuss the matter. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 4:15 pm by NL
The shortage of accommodation means that such difficult choices have to be made.Ms A issued a s.204 appeal on grounds that:The Respondent failed to make sufficient enquiry and failed to take relevant matters into account; The Respondent fettered its discretion and/or applied the wrong test; and The Respondent’s decision is Wednesbury unreasonable.Ms A asked the Court to substitute a decision that the property was not suitable.Waltham defended and said even if it found for Ms A, the… [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 3:48 pm
This paragraph provides: Tompkins apparently asserts that since he did not participate in the Lightbourne evidentiary hearing, due process requires that he be given an individual hearing to litigate the constitutionality of lethal injection.If Tompkins is correct, there is no issue in the law or fact no matter how well settled that would not entitle a defendant to an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 3:19 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
And good now talked with Bill Henderson, who I’m sure everyone knows, Bill, Marlene Gebauer: if not you should. [read post]
13 May 2020, 1:02 am by CMS
He also notes the matter of the amount of data required for all class members is not a matter for this stage of the case. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:26 am by ToddHenderson
As I describe below, I do not think this should matter. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 9:05 am by Casey Flaherty
In pursuit of being less wrong, I refuse to promote simple answers to complex problems no matter how keen my audience is to learn ‘the one quick trick. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm by Mark Bennett
Unlike the District of Columbia, where you can be fined for showing people where the Constitution is (Todd Henderson, Truth on the Market), the blogosphere allows me to serve as your meagerly-paid tour guide to the best of the blawgs. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:31 pm by Marty Lederman
The use of force against bin Laden was justified as a matter of international law not as a reprisal for past acts, but because (as Harold Koh explained) bin Laden continued to have an “unquestioned leadership position within al Qaeda and [a] clear continuing operational role. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:24 am by Paul Horwitz
 You might also look at the cover story in this week's ABA Journal, co-authored by William Henderson, and think a little bit about opportunities in the new legal economy. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 1:11 am
The visitor is considered an invitee especially when he is upon a matter of mutual interest or advantage to the property owner. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am by Schachtman
The law as applied, however, was another matter, with most New Jersey judges keen to find ways to escape the logical and scientific implications of the articulated standards, at least in civil cases.1 For example, in Grassis v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:57 am by DOUGLAS MCGREGOR, BRODIES LLP
In these circumstances Lord Reed accepted that the Supreme Court should approach the matter in the same way as any other court of appeal. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 8:00 pm
As a matter of chronology, the younger someone is, the more likely it is they grew up surrounded by and using technology. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 1:06 pm by Stephen Wm. Smith
This post offers concluding thoughts about the Ackies tracking device case, which I have written about here, here, and here. [read post]