Search for: "People v. Gay"
Results 941 - 960
of 2,210
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2010, 9:47 pm
Failing a legitimate justification, the court says, there is nothing to explain the 1996 federal law except animus against gay people. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 9:06 am
That meeting, too, had a political agenda, defending gay rights, less than 10 years after the Supreme Court had declared in Bowers v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 9:22 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 1:01 pm
Supreme Court’s June decision in U.S. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 9:40 am
The nation's tradition of pluralism under the First Amendment can accommodate the few expressive providers who object to same-sex marriages without impairing the very real need to protect gay people in the public marketplace. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 8:13 am
The Associated Press reports that “[t]hirty-two states that either allow gay marriage or have banned it asked the U.S. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 6:01 am
[Buffalo News] * Humblebrag of the day by Judge Alsup of Oracle v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Might a school that allows a student to wear a “Being Gay is Normal” t-shirt nonetheless lawfully prohibit another student from wearing a t-shirt that expresses the opposite message, such as “God Hates Gays,” on the ground that the latter implicitly attacks gay individuals whereas the former does not attack non-gay individuals? [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
We observe in closing that in Dobbs v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 7:24 am
The Supreme Court has ruled that discrimination against gays, lesbians, and transgender people is a form of gender discrimination prohibited under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Connecticut or Roe v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 4:30 am
Texas, the Court struck down a Texas law that made it a crime for gays and lesbians to have consensual sex in the privacy of their homes, overturning Bowers v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Moreover, over 50 years after the Supreme Court invalidated miscegenation laws in Loving v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 11:38 am
” Yet, in the same paragraph, the majority goes on to say that, if those people enact their views into law, the “necessary consequence is to … demean[] or stigmatize[]” gays and lesbians. [read post]
8 Oct 2016, 7:47 am
Solomon v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 12:32 pm
The ACLU's Northern California chapter, which supports [plaintiffs in Perry v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 6:05 pm
Compare Perfect 10, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 2:03 pm
This measure did more than Supreme Court rulings, like Brown v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:35 am
Additional Resources: U.S. high court turns away dispute over gay worker protections, Dec. 11, 2017, By Andrew Chung, Reuters Evans v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Justice Scalia famously said in his angry dissent from Lawrence v. [read post]
