Search for: "California Law Review" Results 9581 - 9600 of 29,167
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2018, 2:01 pm by Edward Smith
Preliminary reports by the California Highway Patrol (CHP) suggested that the collision occurred shortly after 8:30 in the morning near Victoria Island. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 12:05 pm by Peña & Bromberg, PLC
  In a recent case in a court in the Central District of California, a plaintiff asked for review of the Commissioner’s denial of his request for supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 10:21 am by lcampbell@lawbc.com
  Because the modeled spray drift air concentrations for chlorpyrifos are more than one tenth of this new inhalation RfC, DPR concludes “that chlorpyrifos meets the criteria to be listed as a TAC pursuant to the law of California. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Law Review & Bar Journal Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/lawreviews/2018.html Dismantling monuments. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 3:50 pm by Ali Brodie and Nancy Yaffe
  Under federal law, all employers in the US are required to complete the I-9 in order to verify the identity and employment eligibility of new hires. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 12:34 pm by Michael Markarian
A “Yes” on Prop 12 in California will upgrade the state law to prevent baby veal calves, mother pigs, and egg-laying hens from being crammed inside tiny cages for their entire lives on factory farms. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:47 am by Gene Quinn
However, in April 2015, about six months before the patents were asserted against GoPro in Delaware, GoPro petitioned the PTAB for inter partes review (IPR) proceedings challenging the validity of both patents. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 9:08 am by Native American Rights Fund
Law Review & Bar Journal Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/lawreviews/2018.htmlDismantling monuments. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 9:00 am by Michael H Cohen
“Your Guide to California Dental Practice Act Compliance” was updated in January 2017 to reflect new laws concerning adverse event reporting, scope of practice, required language in the anesthesia informed consent form, online advertising through Groupon, notice of licensure, consulting the Controlled Substance Utilization Review and Evaluation System (CURES), prescriber dispensing of controlled substances and several other areas of practice. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 9:00 am by Michael H Cohen
“Your Guide to California Dental Practice Act Compliance” was updated in January 2017 to reflect new laws concerning adverse event reporting, scope of practice, required language in the anesthesia informed consent form, online advertising through Groupon, notice of licensure, consulting the Controlled Substance Utilization Review and Evaluation System (CURES), prescriber dispensing of controlled substances and several other areas of practice. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 8:16 am by Eric Goldman
I’ve been told that the Board Review Committee on Professional Ethics voted down this request by a 4-5 vote. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
  Here’s an excerpt: California has enacted an extremely broad unfair competition law, Bus. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm by Benjamin Somogyi
Hernandez, a partner at the San Francisco office of Holland & Knight, places much of the blame on the state’s environmental protection law, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 2:35 pm by Eugene Volokh
Of course, none of this is a substitute for law review, moot court, seminars, and other important writing opportunities; but I hope that it will be a helpful supplement. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 11:59 am by divi
The post California Supreme Court Decision Causing Lawsuit Ripple Effect appeared first on Focus Law LA. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 11:01 am by Nancy Yaffe
  Under federal law, all employers in the US are required to complete the I-9 in order to verify the identity and employment eligibility of new hires. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 9:45 am
Challenging DACA's Rescission In California, New York, and Washington, D.C., plaintiffs have challenged the Trump administration’s decision to rescind the DACA program as arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act, a law that governs federal agencies. [read post]