Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 9581 - 9600
of 13,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2018, 7:02 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of California may or may not adopt it. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 5:44 am
Massachusetts, which held that states have the power to make vaccination compulsory in the public interest and the 1944 decision in Prince v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 3:18 pm
Notably, the court distinguished a troublesome decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Wang v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 1:23 pm
Unlike Japan, Europe or even Russia, the United States has never passed legislation on GM crops. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 3:01 pm
The complaint alleges that the proposed respondent, Apple, Inc. of Cupertino, California (“Apple”), unlawfully imports into the U.S., sells for importation, and/or sells within the United States after importation certain electronic devices, including mobile phones, portable music players, and computers which allegedly infringe certain claims of U.S. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 2:15 pm
The complaint filed in California, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al. v. the Departments of Homeland Security and Labor, et al., challenges both the Strengthening Wage Protections for the Temporary and Permanent Employment of Certain Aliens in the United States Rule and the Strengthening of the H-1B Nonimmigrant Visa Classification Rule. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 10:33 am
Through well-established executive authority, the administration will temporarily spare youth educated in America’s schools from expulsion from the United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:28 am
But Bosch v. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 4:10 pm
In the California case, People v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Instead, it doubled down yesterday in a way that I struggled to believe when I saw it this morning: for a patent infringement case in San Diego (Southern District of California) in which Qualcomm stands very little to gain after the judge determined that any damage claims would be limited to a period starting in the spring of 2017, the United States' #1 female lawyer, former Stanford Law School dean and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan name partner Kathleen M. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 11:21 am
Having now, as a judge myself, experienced disagreement over matters far less consequential than the presidency of the United States, I have even more regard for how she navigated that challenging period. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:21 pm
According to the California Supreme Court, it is. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 7:10 am
See, California Native Plant Society v. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 8:04 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 4:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 4:47 am
"Visger and his attorneys would argue that there's greater risk ending up in the workers' compensation system subject to medical decisions that take into consideration the payer's profit margins over the health and well being of the injured.It's a shame.We should not wonder why work comp has such a bad reputation.Visger's case was San Francisco 49ers v. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 10:20 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 10:18 am
De Simone v. [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 1:59 pm
Benjamin Della Rocca and Richard Altieri explained both the newest trade deal between the U.S. and China and new regulations for the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:49 am
United States v. [read post]
