Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 9641 - 9660
of 13,723
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2024, 1:18 pm
They’re looking for reassurance, credibility, and a sense that your firm understands their needs. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 10:52 am
We're pretty sure that there's a similar standard for biologics, too, but we don't know it off-hand. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
” See, e.g., Porter v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
In “Cheng’s Proposed Consensus Rule for Expert Witnesses,”[1] I discussed a recent law review article by Professor Edward K. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm
Rep. 2 (May 2008) (asserting that $4.85 billion Vioxx settlement was for “nuisance” value"); In re Agent Orange Products Liability Litigation, 818 F.2d 145, 171 (2d Cir. 1987) (finding “good reason to view” $180 million Agent Orange settlement as for “nuisance value”). [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 4:49 am
E.g., atroturfing.] [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
Other parts of the legal academy attempt to break down boundaries, e.g. imposing liability in new tort situations. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:46 am
The filings: 1241 - Filed & Entered: 09/04/2012 Order Docket Text: ORDER REGARDING BILL OF COSTS re [1216] Bill of Costs filed by Google Inc., [1228] Brief filed by Google Inc., [1225] Objection filed by Oracle America, Inc.. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 5:36 pm
For example, the IRS rarely addresses the Internet, let alone social media, in any formal guidance on how online communications will be viewed by the IRS with respect to its regulations (e.g., the implications of “Likes” on Facebook and re-tweets on Twitter of political candidates with respect to the IRS electioneering rules). [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:13 am
See In re Joint E. [read post]
1 May 2010, 3:47 am
(e.g. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:52 am
(See, e.g., AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 7:18 am
If you’re not sure whether you should file a claim for workers’ compensation for your hearing loss or sue your employer, get in touch with Schwartzapfel Lawyers right away online or at 516-342-2200. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 3:17 pm
See, e.g., Descamps v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 10:19 am
The SBC must be distributed to participants with initial enrollment materials for a covered plan, and must be re-issued in subsequent years. [read post]
15 May 2017, 6:56 am
Jacoby, you’re going to have a bottom X%. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 11:19 am
The IRS Notice began to address some smaller issues regarding DAFs, but some of the big controversial issues (e.g., minimum distribution requirement) may be addressed in future bills (though I wouldn’t expect anything to pass this year). [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:14 am
State Bar Op. 709 (operating proposed law practice under trade name ‘The Trademark Store’ is impermissible); In re Shephard, 459 N.Y.S.2d 632, 633 (3rd Dep’t1983) (finding ‘The Peoples Law Firm’ was a prohibited trade name); In re Shapiro, 455 N.Y.S. 2d 604, 605 (1st Dep’t 1982) (finding ‘Peoples Legal Clinic, Inc. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 6:18 pm
See, e.g., Allen, 2008 U.S. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:02 pm
Spain taxes How you are taxed in Spain depends on whether you’re considered a tax resident. [read post]
