Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 9641 - 9660 of 178,515
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2023, 9:56 am by Sansone & Lauber
 During the laparoscopic portion of the gallbladder removal procedure (laparoscopic cholecystectomy) Dr was negligent when he clipped and then fully cut the Plaintiffs common hepatic duct. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:56 am by Sansone & Lauber
 During the laparoscopic portion of the gallbladder removal procedure (laparoscopic cholecystectomy) Dr was negligent when he clipped and then fully cut the Plaintiffs common hepatic duct. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:46 am by Seeger Weiss
The post Seeger Weiss Named Plaintiffs Firm of the Year Finalist by National Law Journal’s Elite Trial Lawyers 2023 appeared first on Seeger Weiss LLP. [read post]
17 May 2023, 8:59 am
  Justice Mundy's Dissenting Opinion can be viewed HERE.I send thanks to Attorney Kenneth T. [read post]
17 May 2023, 8:16 am by Irina Manta
" The plaintiffs are represented by Protect Democracy and Ballard Spahr. [read post]
17 May 2023, 7:01 am by Allan Blutstein
.) -- determining that plaintiff was both eligible and entitled to attorney’s fees and costs, but reducing requested fee award from $156k to $106k because: (1) plaintiff failed to show that the rate sought by its attorney rate was consistent with the prevailing market rate for similar legal services; (2) much of the attorney’s work was “needless, duplicative, or inefficient,” and the billing records lacked adequate details; and (3)… [read post]
17 May 2023, 6:19 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Second Circuit affirms after rejecting plaintiff's claims that the trial court improperly excluded certain evidence that would have bolstered the claim.The case is Orsaio v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 6:14 am by Hudson Injury Firm
Under Georgia’s comparative negligence law, the plaintiffs damages award would be reduced to $35,000. [read post]
17 May 2023, 6:00 am by Karen Tani
Negative perceptions contributed to the program’s reform in 1996. [read post]
17 May 2023, 5:26 am by John Coyle
Supreme Court’s decision in Erie Railroad Company v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 5:21 am by Paul Willetts
Hudson’s Bay Company, 2022 ONSC 5230The Bay terminated the plaintiffs employment for economic reasons in September 2020 – following 28 years of employment. [read post]
17 May 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
"...Beyond the district court’s factual error, its decision reflects a misunderstanding of Title VII law. [read post]