Search for: "Burden v. Burden"
Results 9661 - 9680
of 31,121
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2024, 2:39 pm
V. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 9:20 am
In Willingboro Mall v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:15 am
The current case, Murithi v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 3:11 am
Otto Roth & Co. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
(concurring in part and dissenting in part), agreed with the majority, but in his view the February 17, 2012 incident constituted "an accident, not unlike that [described] in Matter of Loia v DiNapoli, 164 AD3d 1513". [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Tomaine v City of Poughkeepsie Police, 178 AD3d 1256, the Appellate Division sustained the Board's determination. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 11:17 am
SCOV looks to State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 7:30 am
As the United States Court of Appeals for the 5thCircuit held in Wallace v Methodist Hospital System, 271 F.3d 212, where the employer has presented a lawful reason to rebut an individual’s prima facie evidence of unlawful discrimination, the burden shifts to the charging party to “present facts to rebut each and every legitimate non-discriminatory reason advanced by [the employer] in order to survive [a motion for] summary judgment” submitted to the court by the… [read post]
1 May 2024, 8:18 am
In Kluge v. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 4:15 am
On Thursday in Wheaton College v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:19 pm
” Mergenthaler v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 12:54 pm
Minardi v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 7:35 am
In fact, the Givauden court, citing Fox v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 6:59 pm
The burden to ascertain whether the court is mistaken or sloppy could be an uncomfortable one, but if you cite People v Clermont, I'm sure your judge will be very understanding and accept your criticism with grace and wit. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 3:22 pm
The Comptroller "possesses the authority to resolve conflicting medical evidence and to credit the opinion of one expert over that of another, so long as the credited expert articulates a rational and fact-based opinion premised upon a physical examination and consideration of the relevant medical records" (Matter of Clorofilla v Hevesi, 38 AD3d 1126, 1126 [2007]; see Matter of Freund v Hevesi, 34 AD3d 950, 951 [2006]). [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am
Citing Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of N.Y., Art. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 11:52 am
Related Issues: PrivacyCell TrackingLocational PrivacyRelated Cases: US v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 7:35 am
The Court reminds us the standard articulated in Littlejohn v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 12:22 pm
Ealy v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:35 am
Affirmed.Case Name: DEANA V. [read post]
