Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 9681 - 9700 of 12,274
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2011, 5:12 pm
All of this was done voluntarily by the defendant almost in a bragging tone as if to say "look at all the hell I have put her through and the hell to come if she does not come around. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:58 am by Susan Brenner
[i]ntentional disobedience or resistance to the lawful process or other mandate of a court”. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
We’re already seeing copyright and TM suits in Second Life; he defends Linden. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm by cdw
 Hopefully things will run on time, however, I remain in trial through at least Monday and likely until Wednesday. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:42 pm by NL
Brighton does not have a permanent travellers' site. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:42 pm by NL
Brighton does not have a permanent travellers' site. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 10:41 am by Schachtman
It pains me that the Respondents (plaintiffs) generally did a better job in explaining significance testing than did the Petitioner (defendant). [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Susan Brenner
For example, for a defendant convicted on an offense with a total offense level of 22 and a criminal history category of I, the Guidelines recommend a sentence of 41–51 months, considering the year of the offense to be the same as the year of the guidelines. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:16 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The statute does not provide plaintiffs or courts carte blanche to micromanage local governments through- out the United States. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:34 pm by INFORRM
English PEN and Index on Censorship complain that “defendants have to jump through too many hoops for their publication to qualify as ‘comment’, while judges tend to be overly analytical in their approach”. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 2:58 pm by My name
Of course, when a plaintiff does not allege a statement which complies with the statute, the defendant will win summary judgment. [read post]