Search for: "State v. Force" Results 9681 - 9700 of 32,555
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The detectives had contended that assigning detectives to patrol duty on a limited basis violated Civil Service Law §§58 and 75 by forcing them to perform work "beneath their rank and title" without a hearing,” appealed the Supreme Court's decision. [read post]
20 May 2017, 8:51 am by cindy
It’s been a long, slow road, but the NSA has been forced to reduce its mass spying in the United States in major ways. [read post]
8 May 2014, 10:57 am by Andrew Alberg
”  The decision may force the United States to pay out claims to all the landowners whose land was converted to bike paths and running trails by the Government as part of its rails-to-trails operation. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 1:46 pm by James P. Yudes, Esq.
  The precondition to state interference was discussed in the United States Supreme Court decision of Troxel v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 3:31 am by Daniel Hemel
“[V]irtually all the state police … [and] also the local police … can get [the exemption] and the feds can’t. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 4:31 am by Giles Peaker
There are still some questions to be cleared up on tenancy deposit law and this Court of Appeal case neatly deals with one of them, while opening up what might be a very large can of worms.Superstrike Ltd v Rodrigues [2013] EWCA Civ 669Where a deposit was taken on an assured shorthold tenancy before April 2007, when the Housing Act 2004 provisions came into force, but the tenancy became a statutory periodic tenancy after April 2007, does the deposit fall to be dealt with under the… [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 4:31 am by Giles Peaker
There are still some questions to be cleared up on tenancy deposit law and this Court of Appeal case neatly deals with one of them, while opening up what might be a very large can of worms.Superstrike Ltd v Rodrigues [2013] EWCA Civ 669Where a deposit was taken on an assured shorthold tenancy before April 2007, when the Housing Act 2004 provisions came into force, but the tenancy became a statutory periodic tenancy after April 2007, does the deposit fall to be dealt with under the… [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 7:37 pm
According to this article, the state department said the visas were denied because there was "little proof they would return home after testifying. [read post]
18 May 2014, 5:59 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court of Canada stated in Atlantic Paper Stock Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]