Search for: "STATE v. SMALL"
Results 9741 - 9760
of 16,895
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2013, 6:27 am
In Millard v Miller, No. 05-C-103-S, 2005 U.S. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 2:31 am
The issue in Commonwealth v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 10:46 am
United States, 406 U.S. 128, 152-153 (1972). [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am
Furthermore, in a 2011 judgment on an immigration case from the Supreme Court, ZH (Tanzania) v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:59 am
Furthermore, in a 2011 judgment on an immigration case from the Supreme Court, ZH (Tanzania) v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:03 pm
Arguing for the federal government in the case of United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
InterDigital Commc’ns v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:08 pm
The shareholders, on the other hand, argue that "A reversal of Basic v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 7:44 am
The Court’s decision in Lyon Shipyard, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:25 am
The main issues in the case, Tanenblatt v. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 3:50 am
That is a view, though, that states continue to reject in large part, and that non-state actors sometimes view as irrelevant. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 1:10 pm
If the volume of a person’s debt collection services is great enough, it is irrelevant that these services only amount to a small fraction of his total business activity. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:10 am
Similarities can be drawn with the recent case of Fenty v Arcadia Group Brands Ltd (t/a Topshop) [discussed by the IPKat here] in which the pop star Rihanna succeeded in her claim for passing off against the retail moguls Topshop, who used her image on a T-shirt without her permission (although Topshop thought they were on solid ground by getting a licence from the photographer to use the picture). [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 2:44 am
On Wednesday (December 4, 2013), the Washington, DC-based United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will hold the long-awaited Oracle v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
However Pupil C, attending a small state-run school which outsources its swimming lessons to an independent service provider, will only be protected if the school can be said to owe her a non-delegable duty of care. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
However Pupil C, attending a small state-run school which outsources its swimming lessons to an independent service provider, will only be protected if the school can be said to owe her a non-delegable duty of care. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 7:57 pm
Supreme Court on behalf of Owners' Counsel of America and the National Federal of Independent Businesses Small Business Legal Center in the case of Brandt v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:20 am
The Court granted review of a government case (Sebelius v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 12:30 pm
Abdo points to two concurring opinions in Jones v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 11:30 am
Rather, it is the unavoidable result of the creation of a market because a market cannot exist without the promise of reward to owners of property who choose to place that property on the market.6 More recently, the Supreme Court has explicitly rejected this erroneous secondary consideration reasoning, reiterating the basic economic logic of copyright in Eldred v. [read post]
