Search for: "Line v. People"
Results 961 - 980
of 13,517
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2023, 11:45 am
Water Dist. v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 5:16 am
Because technical responses to phishing have yet to show themselves to be foolproof, another substantial strand of phishing research has focused on “the people problem,” as Arun Vishwanath puts it in his new book—that is, figuring out how best to train people not to fall for phishing messages. [read post]
1 May 2023, 2:50 pm
The CFO denied through his legal counsel doing anything illegal (See proceedings from Oakland County, People of the State of Michigan v Brian Michael White CR #2021-276874-FH). [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 6:43 am
In the recent case of Atalla v. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 6:24 am
” Payton v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:46 am
If free speech is for people, and corporations aren't people, then is there an element of hypocrisy in supporting a lawsuit by a corporation asserting its right to use its wealth and power with respect to a contentious political issue? [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 4:30 am
Here is the abstract: Times v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Most prominently, in Janus v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 2:04 am
When people hear the word, ‘consent,’ they most often think of intimate relationship dynamics. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 12:58 pm
Schutte v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
The founders of the United States understood that “an ignorant people cannot remain a free people and that democracy cannot survive too much ignorance. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 4:07 am
Walters and Meek v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 1:11 pm
See also ROONEY V. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 10:25 am
Since Roe v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
Nor does the consumer’s lack of understanding have to be reasonable, and there is no required threshold number of people who lacked understanding.[24] Further, a consumer may have a lack of understanding even if he or she is generally aware that a particular consequence may follow—e.g., he or she may be aware of the consequence, but may not understand either the magnitude or likelihood of a particular risk.[25] Evidence of lack of understanding can include direct evidence,… [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:37 am
DorfThe Supreme Court's stay order in Danco Labs v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
Good morning, Chairman McHenry, Ranking Member Waters, and members of the Committee. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 6:36 pm
Concerning private pacts, Biskupic does a flashback to NFIB v. [read post]
