Search for: "Sample v. State"
Results 961 - 980
of 4,095
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2014, 8:33 am
” The Court also found persuasive the government’s brief filed in relation to the petition for a writ of certiorari in US ex rel Nathan v Takeda Pharm N Am which had argued that the claim requirement was both “unsupported by Rule 9(b) and undermines the FCA’s effectiveness as a tool to combat fraud against the United States. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 8:04 am
Specifically, the DOL’s Web site now states: No particular form is required. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 9:12 am
State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 1:47 pm
¶¶ 38-39 (Teva v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 3:53 am
 Back in August, I mentioned State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 8:09 am
This was recently illustrated in a DWI case, Smith v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 11:38 am
(Clark v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
State v. [read post]
10 May 2006, 9:43 pm
The case of Rowley v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 1:39 pm
Related Cases: Maryland v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 7:00 am
In Democratic Nat’l Comm. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 7:00 am
In Democratic Nat’l Comm. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:06 pm
Goodman v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 10:22 am
As noted above, the responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s ban on same-sex marriage) and United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:15 am
State v. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 6:11 pm
Houk, 04-3117 (6th Cir., Oct. 19, 2006); and Johnson v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 12:54 pm
At least in California, which is the only state I can really talk about with any degree of knowledge.So two opinions today that come out exactly how you'd expect, but that nonetheless raised for me one of the traditional lingering questions about how the death penalty (and, arguably, other penalties) actually gets applied in practice. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 9:03 am
The case is called United States v. [read post]
