Search for: "Taylor v. United States"
Results 961 - 980
of 1,441
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2011, 2:12 pm
The Act was codified over two different statutory titles and almost all the cites I have seen to it reference only the public law citation and not the United States Code. [read post]
26 May 2020, 7:55 am
United States, in which the IRS used a ‘John Doe’ summons that sought the identity of clients for whom the law firm had performed certain work. [read post]
22 May 2010, 7:28 am
The question before us is not whether international law prohibits the United States from imposing the sentence at issue in this case. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 6:44 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm
If we look into the past (and not even the very distant past), the law in the United States considered girls and women to be highly valuable living property. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am
Indeed, one expert in the employ of the United States government, who would go on to become a major testifying expert witness for plaintiffs in asbestos litigation, opined in a 1973 publication, that mesothelioma was a problem limited to exposure to South African crocidolite, which was not in every asbestos-containing insulation product.[9] In any event, Judge Wisdom never directly addressed Section 388, and the framing of the Borel case as a consumer case prevailed. [read post]
3 May 2008, 6:37 pm
United States, 450 U.S. 544 (1981). [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:17 am
Sackett v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:46 pm
Taylor, 192 N.Y. 398 (1908); State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
United States, 15-474, involving former Virginia governor Bob McDonnell’s challenge to his fraud conviction; and Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 12:22 am
According to the CDC, it is estimated that 1.4 million cases of salmonellosis occur each year in the United States. [read post]
21 May 2008, 11:05 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
State, 686 S.E.2d 483, 485-86 (Ga. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
The Baze Decision On April 16, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issuedits plurality opinion in Baze v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
In the recent case (Taylor v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 11:37 pm
Levi, 3 S.W. 444, 447 (Tex. 1887); Taylor v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Corizon, Inc., 949 F.3d 489, 506 (9th Cir. 2020) (Bumatay, J., dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc) (same); United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:02 am
Roy is a Trial Attorney, Antitrust Division, United States Department of Justice. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 11:58 am
” Taylor v. [read post]
