Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc." Results 961 - 980 of 7,913
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2012, 4:58 pm by Hunton & Williams LLP
On January 6, 2012, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts granted Michaels Stores, Inc. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 8:13 am by Adam Chandler
Yesterday’s round-up collected coverage of the cert. denial in Tuck-It-Away, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:38 pm by Eugene Volokh
But I just ran across an excellent example that I hadn’t found when doing research on that case, State v. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 6:29 am by Schachtman
  Late last month, however, a First Circuit panel of the United States Court of Appeals held that Rule 702 required perscrutation of expert witness opinion, and then proceeded to perscrutate perspicaciously, in Samaan v. [read post]