Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc."
Results 961 - 980
of 7,952
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2012, 4:58 pm
On January 6, 2012, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts granted Michaels Stores, Inc. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 12:16 pm
The early dismissal would be final as to that claim, see United States v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:54 am
MEDL Mobile, Inc., 2015 WL 1957801 (D. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 8:13 am
Yesterday’s round-up collected coverage of the cert. denial in Tuck-It-Away, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 1:59 am
The Panel in Apple Inc. v. [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
The Supreme Court noted that, under the doctrine of patent exhaustion, 'the initial authorised sale of a patented item terminates all patent rights to that item' (Quanta Computer Inc. v LG Electronics Inc.): the rationale behind this rule is that, once a patentee has received his reward through the sale of the patented item, he has no further right to restrain the use or enjoyment of it (United States v Univis Lens Co.). [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 12:01 pm
On March 19, the Supreme Court will hear argument in Cochise Consultancy Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 6:29 am
Late last month, however, a First Circuit panel of the United States Court of Appeals held that Rule 702 required perscrutation of expert witness opinion, and then proceeded to perscrutate perspicaciously, in Samaan v. [read post]
22 May 2022, 9:41 am
Rumsfeld discussed the government interest in the opening of Part III of the opinion, which was necessary given that the expressive conduct section applied United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 11:24 am
United States, 2004 U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 9:40 am
See, e.g., United States of America v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:40 am
IBP, Inc., 542 F.Supp.2d. 790, 808 (M.D.Tenn.2008) (citing Alvarez, 339 F.3d at 902-03;Bonilla v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:56 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit this week in Harney v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:58 pm
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
5 May 2023, 9:32 am
Plaintiff also relies on United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 9:17 am
(Contracts)HCI Distribution, INC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 9:17 am
(Contracts)HCI Distribution, INC v. [read post]
