Search for: "State v. Weeks" Results 9861 - 9880 of 42,065
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2019, 2:18 pm by Jonathan Shaub
There appeared to be legitimate reasons to support Trump’s first use of this formerly unusual device: The House judiciary committee had given the Justice Department essentially two weeks to comply with a sweeping subpoena covering millions of pages of documents, many which included potentially sensitive information, including classified and grand jury information. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 10:10 am by Scott R. Anderson
In its 1983 decision in the matter of INS v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 7:53 am by Aurora Barnes
The petitions of the week are: Lipschultz v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 6:18 am
Posted by , on Friday, June 14, 2019 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of June 7–13, 2019. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen looks at Comcast v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
' | The IPKat—the new features just keep on coming | Book review: Art and Modern Copyright – the Contested Image Never Too Late 221 [Week ending 5 May] Book review: Competition Law and Intellectual Property in China | Assigned or not assigned? [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 12:34 pm by Tom Zagorsky
The five required sections/categories are as follows: (i) Introduction; (ii) Relationships and Services; (iii) Fees, Costs, Conflicts and Standards of Conduct; (iv) Disciplinary History; and (v) Additional Information. [read post]