Search for: "MATTER OF C A" Results 9921 - 9940 of 36,864
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2019, 1:48 am by Mayela Celis
Some concern is expressed about the addition of “situations involving infringements of security or sovereignty of [the requested] State” as a ground of refusal of recognition and enforcement (art. 7 (1) (c)), because that may invite a review of the merits of the judgment, which is in principle, rightly, prohibited (art. 4(2)). [read post]
23 May 2019, 5:26 pm by Quinta Jurecic
(c) The authority in this memorandum shall terminate upon a vacancy in the office of Attorney General, unless expressly extended by the President. [read post]
23 May 2019, 6:34 am by UKSC Blog
” (C) Diversity in the Law You recently sat on the first UK Supreme Court with a female majority. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
It doesn’t matter who the person is, what title that individual holds, or how successful he or she may be. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm by MOTP
But the dispositive legal issues in the case may have ramifications that go beyond the employment context because they involve matters of common-law contract law; specifically, the element of a meeting of the minds in the absence of a formal written contract executed by both parties. [read post]
21 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Her most recent book, Beating Hearts: Abortion and Animal Rights (co-authored with Michael C. [read post]
21 May 2019, 7:28 pm by Rob Robinson
It is one of only a few providers that can service complex cross-border matters in a manner compliant with data privacy laws. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am by ASAD KHAN
In O and L (C-356/11 and C-357/11, EU:C:2012:776), the CJEU held that the derivative right is “specific in character” that only arises “exceptionally” where the “effectiveness of the Union citizenship enjoyed by that national would otherwise be undermined”. [read post]
20 May 2019, 11:00 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
It was also indicated, with reference to the arguments provided up to that stage by appellant-opponent 3, that novelty of the subject-matter of granted claim 1 in view of D1 would require discussion, but that the subject-matter of the claim appeared to lack an inventive step when starting from D18 as the closest prior art in combination with the teaching of D3 (or D2). [read post]
20 May 2019, 3:25 pm by Law Lady
Moreover, Florida Statutes 61.13(2)(c)(2) requires that a trial court must order shared parental responsibility “unless the court finds that shared parental responsibility would be detrimental to the child. [read post]
§ 1512(c), they argue, would exempt Trump’s actions because the statute does not clearly state that it covers presidents; the statute’s text instead covers corruptly motivated obstructive acts by “[w]hoever” commits them. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am by Schachtman
The facts of silica cases, for example, are radically different from early exposure asbestos cases because of the wide diffusion and general equality of knowledge of silica hazards throughout industry, labor, and government.[7]  The dangers of occupational exposure to crystalline silica were so well known that the New York Court of Appeals recognized, seventy years ago, that “[i]t is a matter of common knowledge that it is injurious to the lungs and dangerous to health to work in… [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Should it be based on how the highest court ruled on the matter, which would then—on the particular waiver issue in this example-- result in a tie between the State of Texas (based state common law) and the Fifth Circuit (based on federal common law).Or should the counting and coding be based on how different courts ruled regardless of whether they were ultimately reversed? [read post]
20 May 2019, 7:45 am by William Ford
Collaborates with GS Communication staff on matters pertaining to public/private events and GS Development staff on matters pertaining to donor proposals. [read post]
20 May 2019, 3:22 am by Orin Kerr
"  The officer shouldn't stop a person for one reason and then ask questions that aren't necessary to investigate the matter that provided the constitutional justification for the stop. [read post]