Search for: "A A QUALITY CONSTRUCTION v THOMAS" Results 81 - 100 of 164
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2015, 2:38 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
gloc=W100DD--This file contains records relating to the case of Sawyer and Man v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 7:39 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
App. 1921) (where the failure was the installation in a country residence of pipe which was of identical quality but a different brand than the contractually specified pipe) and the House of Lords in Ruxley Electronics & Construction Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 9:17 am by Steven M. Taber
  However, the legal landscape with respect to this aspect may have changed a bit with the decision in Helicopter Association International v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am by Wells Bennett
At any rate, the burden is on the plaintiffs, under the Amnesty v. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 11:57 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
Construction law – consultants – liability of consultant to contractor – negligence- subsurface information Thomas G. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
  With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 6:03 am by Nietzer
Allen believes that there are five key elements to any “well-constructed policy”. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
 We all know Justice Thomas’ answer – but he is an extremist on the issue. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am by Bruce Ackerman
(For a recent reevaluation, see Thomas Colby's essay in Northwestern Law Review.)Taken in their own terms, the coercive Article Five exchange between Congress and the states does not establish the constitutional "quality" of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]