Search for: "A CHOICE FOR WOMEN V. AGENCY FOR HEALTH" Results 81 - 100 of 203
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by The Regulatory Review
The regulation is part of an effort to preserve the reproductive rights of women in the aftermath of the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm by Noah Brown
Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, which held there was no constitutional right to abortion. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 5:31 am by Michael C. Dorf
Thus, the final reading for the course will be Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
The agency stated that the revised rule would help identify public health threats. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:46 am by Paige Collings
And law enforcement and other government agencies are regular buyers. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” Yesterday’s second argument was in Barr v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:00 am by Seamus Hughes, Devorah Margolin
Prior to the ruling, federal courts were able to prosecute individuals as young as 15 for material support, but in the wake of the Sessions v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Court’s recent decision overturning its 1973 decision Roe v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 7:57 am by DONALD SCARINCI
 While a district court struck down the abortion law, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals distinguished the facts of the case from Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
Supreme Court case, Lucia v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 11:05 am by John Elwood
Planned Parenthood Center for Choice now argues that under United States v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 1:09 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000), which held that an “action was barred because it directly conflicted with the agency’s policy choice to encourage flexibility to foster innovation. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The Court found that the law didn’t impose an undue burden on women because it was designed to “ensure an informed choice. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am by Schachtman
However, if we recognize that 5% is not a magic line, then the choice between one tail and two is less important—as long as the choice and its effect on the p-value are made explicit. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 9:16 pm by Tyler Hoguet
Frederique Welgryn, Perrigo’s Global Vice President for Women’s Health, called FDA’s approval “a groundbreaking expansion for women’s health” in the United States. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Recommendations to Congress, federal and state policy-makers, relevant federal agencies, and medical associations, through the social model lens of valuing the lives of persons with disabilities. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:58 am by Lyle Denniston
Thus, in the span of two days, the Court had extended First Amendment protection against coerced speech or conduct in the realms of politics and women’s health care. [read post]