Search for: "Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 251
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2017, 8:03 am
(quoting Holy Cross Church of God in Christ v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 9:38 am
In 2015, Anthem, the second-largest health carrier, which operates the Blue Cross Blue Shield brand in 14 states, agreed to merge with third-largest Cigna, in what would be the biggest-ever merger of health insurers. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 12:35 pm
Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield, 152 F. 3d 67, 71–72 (CA2 1998); Pine View Gardens, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 1:49 pm
Blue Cross Blue Shield, 825 F.3d 299 (6th Cir. 2016). [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 1:49 pm
Blue Cross Blue Shield, 825 F.3d 299 (6th Cir. 2016). [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 6:56 am
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of South Carolina; No. 9:17-cv-594 (D.S.C. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 6:56 am
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of South Carolina; No. 9:17-cv-594 (D.S.C. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:03 am
Blue Cross Blue Shield, which addressed whether health care providers had standing under ERISA to sue health plans for payment for services rendered to plan participants, given that the providers are not one of the categories of individuals – participants, beneficiaries and fiduciaries – expressly granted the power to assert benefit, breach of fiduciary duty or equitable relief claims under ERISA. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 12:56 pm
Blue Cross Blue Shield, 2010 WL 1257755 (D. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 6:56 am
If you’re curious about frivolous defenses and vexatious appeals, the case of Miller v Blue CrossBlue Shield Michigan, No: 326300, unpublished, is worth a read.The facts concern a denial of coverage by Blue Cross Blue Shield Michigan (BCBSM) for care provided to Francis Miller, who, after challenging the denial, petitioned the Washtenaw County Circuit Court to review the decision. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 3:25 pm
The purpose of the penalty, as the government explained to the Supreme Court in NFIB v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 8:36 am
Blue Cross Blue Shield, 654 F.3d 618, 630 (6th Cir. 2011). [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 9:12 am
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, 809 F. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:14 am
Instead, it required insurance companies – private insurance carriers like Aetna and Blue Cross/Blue Shield – to issue entirely separate plans. [read post]
17 May 2016, 7:33 am
See Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Blue Cross Blue Shield and King v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:41 am
In such cases, an employer purchases an employee insurance policy from an insurance company, or issuer, such as Aetna or Blue Cross/Blue Shield, and the issuer itself then bears the costs of reimbursing employees for their health care expenses. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 5:00 am
The Liberty Mutual plan uses Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts as third-party administrator, and Blue Cross was under pressure to provide information concerning the Liberty Mutual plan to Vermont. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 5:00 am
The Liberty Mutual plan uses Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts as third-party administrator, and Blue Cross was under pressure to provide information concerning the Liberty Mutual plan to Vermont. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 8:12 am
” The case arose when Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. directed its third-party administrator, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc., not to report to Vermont’s all-payer database. [read post]
