Search for: "Burns v. U.s.*" Results 81 - 100 of 341
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2010, 9:05 am by William Morriss
In terms of unjust application of the regs in the past, I refer readers to Rendon v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 8:35 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The trial court slashed and burned that fee application, awarding the attorneys $221,502.98 in fees, based on a uniform hourly rate of $300. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:20 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The question to be wondered about is, what happens if your home burns as the result of an arson fire? [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:48 pm
Supreme Court to review his, her or its burning legal issue that all other appellate courts have rejected, dismissed or pooh-poohed. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 8:54 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
See, e.g., Country Vint- ner, 718 F.3d at 260 (allowing costs of converting electron- ic files to non-editable formats and burning the files onto discs); Race Tires, 674 F.3d at 171 (allowing costs of scanning hard-copy documents, converting file format to production format, and transferring of VHS tapes to DVD); Hecker v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 7:09 am by Jordan Bublick
City of Cartersville, GA, 348 F.3d 1289, 1293 (11th Cir. 2003),  Burnes v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
He burned CDs of the information he extracted from the phone. . . . [read post]
Overview The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 subjects hazardous material to federal regulation if it is solid waste.[1]  In general, RCRA is designed to address the problems related to hazardous waste disposal at local landfills.[2]  RCRA establishes a permitting scheme to regulate the disposal of hazardous waste and determine liability. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 6:36 pm by Keith Rizzardi
 The Project permits salvage logging of trees on approximately 1,652 of the 27,000 acres that were burned. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 11:29 am by Kent Scheidegger
  They know it when they see it.For the fate of Congress's previous attempt, see United States v. [read post]