Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 81 - 100
of 14,577
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2007, 7:02 pm
Eicher v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 9:23 am
Taken together with the Court’s recent decision in Oak Grove Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:39 am
" ** See Dobrin v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 6:56 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Administrative Appeals Opinions Body: SC19027 - Lane v. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 4:35 am
An ALJ is a hearing officer that is hired by the United States Social Security Administration (SSA) to hear claims that have already been administratively denied. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
* Following a hearing, the Office of Professional Discipline advocated for a revocation of LPN's license. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 5:57 pm
Administrative law in Ohio has courts and practitioners flummoxed. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 11:41 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 3:00 pm
On Wednesday, September 12, 2018, Leonard Stamm appeared in the Court of Appeals to argue the case of Owusu v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 9:10 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Chevron v. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 10:26 am
Supreme Court will hear arguments in Garland v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 2:09 am
Finnerty and another v Clark and another; In re St George’s Property Services (London) Ltd (in administration) [2011] EWCA Civ 858; [2011] WLR (D) 246 “The administrators of an insolvent company were the officers of the court with statutory powers to exercise their discretion to act for the interests of the creditors as a whole. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:19 pm
The PTAB is a part of the Patent Office and is staffed by administrative patent judges. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
An administrative determination made after a hearing will be sustained by the court if the decision is supported by substantial evidenceDeStefano v Incorporated Vil. of Mineola, 2018 NY Slip Op 08481, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentMichael A. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
An administrative determination made after a hearing will be sustained by the court if the decision is supported by substantial evidenceDeStefano v Incorporated Vil. of Mineola, 2018 NY Slip Op 08481, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentMichael A. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 9:15 am
In a recent Supreme Court decision in Arthrex v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
Department of Justice (DOJ) sent a letter to the Supreme Court amending the position the federal government was taking in California v. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 2:00 am
When the Supreme Court decided SEC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 11:38 am
Quoting the Supreme Court’s landmark Marbury v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 12:10 pm
Removal of an officer of a political subdivision of the State for misconduct, maladministration, malfeasance or malversation in officeMatter of Hedman v Town Bd. of Town of Howard, 2008 NY Slip Op 09229, decided on November 21, 2008, Appellate Division, Fourth Department Gerald S. [read post]
