Search for: "Cox v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 485
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2014, 12:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 7:50 pm
” [via Tim Cone @ Defense Newsletter Blog] Other United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 9:15 am
United States, 2015 U.S. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 3:34 pm
See United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 12:18 pm
Now Judge Jeffrey Sutton of the Sixth Circuit has written a concurrence in a decision, United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 2:18 pm
This is the Kate Cox case. [read post]
5 May 2008, 11:35 pm
Cox, 2008 U.S. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 6:30 am
United States (2012), presidential administrations have used litigation to curtail the excesses of enforcement-minded state policies. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:24 am
Takara, Senior Airman (E-4), United States Air Force, Petitioners v. [read post]
20 Jul 2006, 7:40 am
" The lawsuit, often described as "Roe v Wade for Men," was filed by Matthew Dubay in the United States District Court at Bay City, Michigan. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 11:18 am
Cox v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 7:00 am
United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 7:57 am
Sullivan, 532 U.S. 769, 771-72 (2001) (reversing granting of motion to suppress based on officer's alleged "improper subjective motivation"); United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 1:04 pm
Cox v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:16 am
Cox:As provided by Title 28, Section 508(B) of the United States Code and Title 28, Section 0.132(A) of the Code of Federal Regulations, I have today assumed the duties of Acting Attorney General.In that capacity I am, as instructed by the President, discharging you, effective a [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 2:08 pm
United States, 2018 U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:30 am
*A United States District Court judge granted the City’s motion for summary judgment, holding that Matthews had spoken as a public employee and not as a citizen and thus his speech was not protected by the First Amendment.Citing Cox v Warwick Valley Central School District, 654 F3d 267, the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals said that the test it applied in cases in which a plaintiff asserts a First Amendment retaliation claim requires the plaintiff to establish… [read post]
12 May 2013, 8:00 am
United States Department of Justice, 2013 U.S. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 6:36 pm
See R.C.M. 705(c)(1)(B) (“A term or condition in a pretrial agreement shall not be enforced if it deprives the accused of: . . . the complete and effective exercise of post-trial and appellate rights”); see also United States v. [read post]
