Search for: "Disciplinary Counsel v. York"
Results 81 - 100
of 408
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2009, 3:31 am
New York traveled through a sea change in its attorney disciplinary and ethical rules when the new rules were enacted in April. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Kevin Osowski of counsel), for respondents. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Kevin Osowski of counsel), for respondents. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 1:43 pm
The opinion in Hill v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
COIB Case No. 2013-258The New York City Conflicts of Interest Board (COIB) adopted in full OATH Administrative Law Judge Kara J. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
Further, in Graham v Coughlin, 72 NY2d 1014, the Court of Appeals upheld the removal of a state correction officer following his conviction of a felony under federal law. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 1:43 am
Mack: Qualcomm v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:55 am
Finding that an employer’s outside counsel provided predominantly HR and business advice — rather than legal advice — during the company’s internal investigation into an employee’s discrimination and retaliation complaints, a federal magistrate judge in New York granted in part the employee’s motion to compel the production of documents listed on the employer’s privilege log (Koumoulis v Independent Financial Marketing Group, Inc,… [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Julie Steiner of counsel), for respondent. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Julie Steiner of counsel), for respondent. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 11:34 am
Doe v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
The administrative body, rather than its attorney, must indicate the basis for its administrative action or decision Matter of Weill v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2009 NY Slip Op 02534, decided on April 2, 2009, Appellate Division, First DepartmentScott A. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 8:08 am
“SMART COMMUNICATIONS, HOLDING, INC. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 11:34 am
Significantly, said the Appellate Division, the individual did not challenge the disciplinary findings against her. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:25 am
Significantly, said the Appellate Division, the individual did not challenge the disciplinary findings against her. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 3:55 am
Federal Court sustains employer application for employee’s involuntary retirement for disabilityCampbell v City of New York, USDC, SDNYJonathan Campbell, claiming that the City of New York deprived him of liberty and property without due process of law in violation of his Fourteenth Amendment rights and his civil rights under 42 USC 1983 when it found him mentally incapacitated and involuntarily retiring him from his position as a New York City Transit… [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:44 am
The administrative body, rather than its attorney, must indicate the basis for its administrative action or decision Matter of Weill v New York City Dept. of Educ., 61 AD3d 407Scott A. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Further, said the Appellate Division, the records, which contain factual details regarding misconduct allegations and punishments imposed on officers, could contain "material ripe for degrading, embarrassing, harassing or impeaching the integrity of [the] officer[s]," citing New York Civil Liberties Union v New York City Police Department, 2018 NY Slip Op 0842. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Further, said the Appellate Division, the records, which contain factual details regarding misconduct allegations and punishments imposed on officers, could contain "material ripe for degrading, embarrassing, harassing or impeaching the integrity of [the] officer[s]," citing New York Civil Liberties Union v New York City Police Department, 2018 NY Slip Op 0842. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 4:00 pm
In Falk v. [read post]
