Search for: "Doctor v. Employment Division"
Results 81 - 100
of 359
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2012, 4:04 am
” Richardson did not indicated that his physical disabilities played a role in his decision to retire and, in addition, he testified that he never discussed retirement with his doctors, did not advise the employer that he was retiring due to his disabilities and never asked for an accommodation to return to work within his restrictions. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 10:18 am
In the case of Wills v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 2:50 pm
In the matter of Walter v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:17 pm
In Ciszkowski v Canac Kitchens, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice concluded that a long-term employee was constructively dismissed when he considered himself demoted upon his return to work from heart surgery. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:24 am
So if a doctor said it was necessary then it was...Now, the First District Court of Appeals for California has agreed to hear a constitutional challenge to the IMR process.A date and time for the oral argument in Stevens v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division said that “These facts would have been highly material to her claim against [the day care center], and it was highly misleading, at best, for [AD] to omit her City employment from her submissions to the District Court. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 5:57 pm
” The Appellate Division held:"In reaching her decision, in this case, the judge appropriately employed this process and also relied upon our decision in Coalition for Quality Health Care v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
If the collective bargaining agreement does not set out procedures for conducting GML §207-c hearings, the employer is free to establish such a procedureNassau County Sheriff's Correction Officers Benevolent Assn., Inc. v Nassau County, 2016 NY Slip Op 02096, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe Nassau County Sheriff's Correction Officers Benevolent Assn., Inc. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 2:02 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 4:15 am
Wild’s employment began, his doctors diagnosed him with cancer. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 11:23 am
Ponsi v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 4:07 am
Although her doctor placed work restrictions on her during that time, her employer was able to accommodate those restrictions without wage loss and therefore did not report the injury to the Division of Workers' Compensation or admit or deny liability. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 9:53 am
Borello & Sons, Inc v Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 3:55 am
The Fourteenth Amendment means that a local or state government employer may not involuntarily retire a public employee from his or her work without due process of law, citing Board of Regents v Roth, 408 U.S. 564 and Cleveland Board of Education v Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532; and3. [read post]
10 May 2017, 5:30 am
Does the EAJA permits the award of attorneys' fees and costs to a prevailing plaintiff in an action against the State under the Human Rights Law for sex discrimination in employment by a state agency. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 6:48 am
The most comprehensive discussion of this ambiguous phrase comes from Arbitrator Chauvin in Access Alliance Multicultural Community v Health, Office, Professional Employees and Education Division of UFCW, Local 175. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 7:26 am
The Supreme Court today hears oral argument in Young v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
The plaintiff, Andrea Mosby-Meachem, worked as an in-house labor and employment attorney for Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
The plaintiff, Andrea Mosby-Meachem, worked as an in-house labor and employment attorney for Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 7:25 am
Duke’s after-acquired evidence defense to the doctor’s ADA claim also failed as did the doctor’s tort claims against a related entity (Shaughnessy v. [read post]
