Search for: "Doe v. Arizona, State of, et al" Results 81 - 100 of 233
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm by Bill Marler
References Bell BP, Goldoft M, Griffin PM, Davis MA, Gordon DC, Tarr PI, Bartleson CA, Lewis JH, Barrett TJ, Wells JG, et al., (1994). [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 11:42 am by Scott Hervey
” ASCAP, BMI, et al have expressed a slightly different opinion. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 4:39 pm by Marty Lederman
  And that is precisely the reading of RFRA that Hobby Lobby, et al., are arguing for in the Supreme Court.Observers such as Doug Laycock are absolutely right that, contrary to popular reports, the Arizona bill would not necessarily—and certainly not expressly—have “given business owners the right to refuse service to gay men, lesbians and other people on religious grounds. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 11:55 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” Hilton, 502 U.S. at 202 (citing Arizona v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am by Allison Trzop
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in Shelby County v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 9:35 am by Max Mallory
 The firm also represented Louisiana Wholesale Drug Company et al. as an amicus in support of the petitioner in FTC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm by Kedar Bhatia
(Sotomayor, J., recused)   March (5) Arizona v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am by Kedar Bhatia
(Sotomayor, J., recused)   March (5) Arizona v. [read post]