Search for: "Edward v. Surprise, City of"
Results 81 - 99
of 99
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2010, 8:34 am
But they aren’t surprising. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 12:01 am
Under the terms of a 1972 lease agreement between Conquistador and the Jaffe Group, Conquistador was required to transfer to the Jaffe Group whatever right it had, if any, in the “Tropicana” name after the termination of the lease.Later, in 1977, the Jaffe Group formed a partnership with Edward and Fred Doumani (the “Doumanis”) named Tropicana Enterprises which succeeded the Jaffe Group as the lessor in the lease agreement with Conquistador. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm
App. 2003) (asbestos); Edwards v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 8:18 am
pid=20601087&sid=a7zD382h2EM8http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/06/cirm-hires-attorney-not-registered.html***Related to "City of Hope," readers might want to review the case "City of Hope v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
One of the events is celebrating William Neilson Edward Hall, whose parents were freed slaves from America. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
In a rather refreshing and surprising move, SOTS Bysiewicz chose to respond with a post on Ryan's blog. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 7:03 am
New London, which upheld the city of New London's seizure of private land for development. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
But negotiators say they hope to at least plot a course toward a new agreement that could be signed at next year’s climate conference in Mexico City. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 1:52 am
Though the settlement in Toysrus.com v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 12:00 pm
In the document one cannot find surprising new strategies for trademarks or copyright protection and enforcement. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Implications for policy and practice are discussed.Sexual victimization has become one of the most publicized issues of our time (Edwards & Hensley, 2001). [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
According to one press report, Angel Diaz "appeared to be moving 24 minutes after the first injection, grimacing, blinking, licking his lips, blowing and appearing to mouth words". [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 2:46 pm
None of that occurred in People v. [read post]
27 May 2007, 10:11 pm
On reflection, that’s not terribly surprising, considering the scale and suddenness of the German attack. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 7:44 am
Indeed, in Bryan v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 3:11 am
" The Appellate Division, First Department recently addressed this threshold issue in Edwards v. [read post]
15 Jun 2004, 11:47 am
So, too, in answer to political concerns, in 1285, "a statute of Edward I referred to "fools who delight in their folly" and banned tournaments and swordplay in London as well as prohibiting the teaching of swordsmanship in the city on pain of 40 days' imprisonment.State intervention has not only been directed at the players in this regard. [read post]
