Search for: "English v. Jacobs" Results 81 - 100 of 265
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2018, 3:36 pm
Did Unwired Planet need to first comply with the Huawei v ZTE steps? [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 7:18 am
  This limitation was recognized by Jacob LJ in Mayne Pharma. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 10:26 am
"infringes") irrespective of the patent's validity unless and until the patent is finally declared invalid (see Jacob LJ in Celltech v Medimmune [2004] EWCA Civ 1331). [read post]
2 May 2018, 12:22 am
Katfriend Jacob Tesch reports on this panel which discussed Performing Rights Organisations, potential copyright reforms in the field (Music Modernisation Act, the Classics Act and the Allocation for Music Producers Act) and the High Court of England and Wales decision in Gloucester Place Music v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:45 am
Mr Justice Arnold of held that English contract law was controlling and that service of a notice of termination under the U.S. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 7:15 am by Brian Cordery
Floyd LJ also agreed with statements made by Jacob LJ in Markem v Zipher [2005] EWCA Civ 267 that cross-examination on key evidence is important for procedural fairness, not just from the perspective of the parties, but also the witnesses. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 1:00 pm
: English translation of Dutch Supreme Court decision in MSD v Teva highlights UK Supreme Court's Actavis decision I Student essays: how to write a good piece? [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 4:06 am
: English translation of Dutch Supreme Court decision in MSD v Teva highlights UK Supreme Court's Actavis decision I Student essays: how to write a good piece? [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:09 am
: English translation of Dutch Supreme Court decision in MSD v Teva highlights UK Supreme Court's Actavis decision I Student essays: how to write a good piece? [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am by Lorelie S. Masters
H v L, [2017] EWHC 137 (Comm) H v L, [2017] EWHC 137 (Comm), also demonstrates potentially important differences between New York and English law. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am by Lorelie S. Masters and Paul T. Moura
H v L, [2017] EWHC 137 (Comm) H v L, [2017] EWHC 137 (Comm), also demonstrates potentially important differences between New York and English law. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 11:02 am
: English translation of Dutch Supreme Court decision in MSD v Teva highlights UK Supreme Court's Actavis decisionWeekly Roundups: Around the IP Blogs! [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:40 am by Lorelie S. Masters and Paul T. Moura
In particular, English courts generally conduct a far more restrictive review of foreign law as compared to English law. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:40 am by Lorelie S. Masters
In particular, English courts generally conduct a far more restrictive review of foreign law as compared to English law. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 3:14 am
As the decision was mint fresh and no English was available, Kat friend Tobias Cohen Jehoram provided a translation and a summary in English for us.Unpredictable times come with unpredictable patent decisions. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 9:57 am by Lorelie S. Masters
  She is co-author, with English Barristers, Richard Jacobs QC and Paul Stanley QC, of Liability Insurance in International Arbitration: The Bermuda Form (Hart Publishing, 2d ed. 2011) (“The Bermuda Form”), which won the 2012 Book Prize of the British Insurance Law Association for outstanding contributions to the literature on insurance coverage. [read post]