Search for: "Even v. City of Parker"
Results 81 - 100
of 261
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2010, 6:07 am
That case is Gordon v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 12:47 pm
When the justices took the bench this morning to hear oral argument in District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 2:49 am
Rather, a defendant must aim “to permanently deprive the victim[] of the property” (People v Medina, 18 NY3d 98, 105 [2011]; see People v Jennings, 69 NY2d at 118; People v Jacobs, 52 AD3d 432, 433 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 833 [2008]; see also People v Parker, 121 AD3d 1190, 1191 [2014]). [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:56 pm
See, e.g., Parker v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 2:10 pm
Last weekend EFF took part in the Eleventh Hackers On Planet Earth (HOPE) conference in New York City and got to meet so many of our wonderful supporters. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 1:56 pm
Judge Barrington Parker said that confidence in the jury’s verdict was undermined because the government did not disclose a number of SEC deposition transcripts “pursuant to Brady v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 8:15 am
In Kelo v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:59 pm
Parker, or uphold the Kelo takings. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:34 am
Mellon and Massachusetts v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:08 am
In Parker v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:08 am
In Parker v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
The court of appeals in Parker v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 5:44 pm
Mann in 1830 and State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 11:37 am
Parker v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 12:37 pm
The City also cites Wills v Amerada Hess Corp. in support of dismissal. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 5:52 am
Parker, 2022 WL 17403220 (D.D.C. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 8:36 am
Parker Drilling Mgmt.Servs., Ltd., 881 F.3d 1078, 1083 (9th Cir. 2018). [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 8:40 am
[These exist in many states and some counties and cities, but are rarely focused on.] [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 5:19 am
Pataki, 408 F 3d 75, 86 [2nd Cir, 2005]; Parker v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 9:03 pm
Second, they offer the Supreme Court’s 5–4 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
