Search for: "Ford Motor Co. v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 224
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2015, 5:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Selden and the decision in question is Columbia Motor Car Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by John Elwood
The denial in Ford Motor Company v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
The petition of the day is: Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm by Kraft Palmer Davies, PLLC
Gwinn stated that Hedges was an “excellent candidate” for treatment with an SCS, and referred him to physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist Glen James David, M.D. for a trial SCS. 14. [read post]
13 May 2015, 10:49 am by Richard S. Zackin
We previously reported on a decision by a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Equal Opportunity Employment Commission v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 12:40 am
The challenge to secure registration is even greater because slogans are often treated merely as a form of advertisement rather than a source identifier (indeed, this might be the case even if the hashtag-based mark includes a well-known registered mark).Trade marks go socialPerhaps there is another way to view hashtag marks such as those above, based on the approach suggested by Judge Kozinski of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.In Plasticolor Molded Products v Ford… [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:12 am by Beth Van Schaack
Ford Motor Company, a case involving corporate complicity in the system of apartheid, for persuasive reasoning in this regard). [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:43 am by Schachtman
Leinweber Co., Inc., Driv-Lok, Inc., Ford Motor Co., and ExxonMobil Oil Corp. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
American Honda Motor Co., 505 So.2d 358, 361 (Ala. 1987) (cited in Deere). [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Virginia viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and upholding the maximum amount a rational jury could award on the record so viewed (measured by the relevant legal guideposts), based on Honda Motor Co. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:54 am by Ben
It claims that Ford and General Motors are in breach of the 1992 Audio Home Recording Act by placing hard drives in their cars that, amongst other things, allow users to rip music onto the disk for in-car enjoyment, without paying a levy to the AARC under the provisions of the  Audio Home Recording Act - although the 1999 case between the RIAA and Diamond Multimedia Sy [read post]