Search for: "Given v. Wright" Results 81 - 100 of 844
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2022, 7:56 am by Dennis Crouch
An example of this is famously seen in the Wright Brothers early aircraft patents. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
Although the TTC concept allows a calculation of an estimated “safe exposure,” the FDA points out that: “exceeding the TTC is not necessarily associated with an increased cancer risk given the conservative assumptions employed in the derivation of the TTC value. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
Art, Music and Copyright The Evan Law blog has an article summarising Finley v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 4:34 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Nat'l Ass'n for Legal Gun Defense, LLC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 18 February 2022, judgement was given in favour of the claimants in the defamation claim Thunder Studios Inc (California) v Kazal (No 12) [2022] FCA 110. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 2:29 pm by Alden Abbott
Given the manifold benefits of mergers in general, the negative and merger-skeptical tone of the RFI is regrettable. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
On 28 January 2022 Warby LJ refused permission to appeal in Wright v McCormack. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 8:46 am by Andrew Delaney
The judge refused to consider diminished capacity because the defense hadn’t given the prosecution notice. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 2:18 am by Robin Stewart
Lord Justice Lewison referred to the case of Collier v P & M J Wright (Holdings) Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 1329, [2018] 1 WLR 643 where the phrase “grounds which appear to the court to be substantial” was considered but in the context of insolvency proceedings. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm by Giles Peaker
In Collier v P & M J Wright (Holdings) Ltd (2007) EWCA Civ 1329 that test had been held to be the same as that for summary judgment. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 12:39 am by INFORRM
Despite the Supreme Court having apparently answered the question in Barton v Wright Hassall LLP [2018] UKSC 12 (where it was held a litigant-in-person should not be treated differently to a legally-represented party), practitioners will tell you that the reality is often very different. [read post]