Search for: "Grant v. Bristol-Myers Squibb" Results 81 - 100 of 140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2012, 4:23 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., 2011 WL 2784101, at *3 (D.N.J. 2011), the Court did not hold that the warning label was enough to give notice. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 11:53 am
You can separately subscribe to the Pharma & Biotech edition of the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review by subscribing by email, or selecting ‘all posts’ or ‘Pharma, Biotech & Chem’ for the RSS option at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Oxytrol (Oxybutynin) - US: Watson files patent infringement lawsuit against Barr over application to market generic Oxytrol; Barr challenges Oxytrol patent… [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:05 am
‘The solution lies in resources’ says FDA Commissioner Hamburg (FDA Law Blog)   Products Actoplus MET (Pioglitazone) – US: Takeda files patent infringement suit against Aurobindo following Para IV certification as part of ANDA to manufacture generic Actoplus MET (Patent Docs) Advair diskus (Fluticasone, Salmeterol) – US: PTO denies PTE for Advair diskus patent; Office again clarifies that PTEs are not availabile for ‘synergistic combinations’ containing… [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:05 am
‘The solution lies in resources’ says FDA Commissioner Hamburg (FDA Law Blog)   Products Actoplus MET (Pioglitazone) – US: Takeda files patent infringement suit against Aurobindo following Para IV certification as part of ANDA to manufacture generic Actoplus MET (Patent Docs) Advair diskus (Fluticasone, Salmeterol) – US: PTO denies PTE for Advair diskus patent; Office again clarifies that PTEs are not availabile for ‘synergistic combinations’ containing… [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:59 pm
 (Patent Docs) (SmartBrief) (GenericsWeb) OxyContin (Oxycodone) – US: Ranbaxy admits infringement in OxyContin suit – District Court S D New York approves consent judgment between Ranbaxy and Purdue Pharma (Patent Docs) Reyataz (Atazanavir) – US: Complaint filed in Delaware: Infringement of US patent following a Paragraph IV challenge: Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. et al. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
A patent defines a monopoly granted to an inventor in consideration of the disclosure of the invention to the public. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:52 pm by John Elwood
The court also granted last Thursday in the much less colorful two-time relist Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 1:12 pm by Dennis Crouch
“And Trimble is headquartered in California, connecting California to Trimble’s claims, which is a consideration the Court in Ford found relevant in distinguishing its earlier decision in Bristol-Myers. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 1:48 am by Kelly
(Patents Post Grant Blog) US: University inventions, Stanford vs Roche (IPEG) US: What ultimately matters in deciding the ‘gene patenting’ issue? [read post]