Search for: "Hospital Authority v. Jones"
Results 81 - 100
of 198
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2015, 9:30 am
”Similarly, a New York City Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings' administrative law judge held that an employee may be disciplined for refusing to cooperate in a non-disciplinary investigation interview [NYC Health and Hospital Corporation v Jones, OATH Index #1100/10, posted on the Internet at:http://archive.citylaw.org/oath/10_Cases/10-1100.pdf].The decision is posted on the Internet… [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 5:01 am
” Although the focus was on same-sex marriage and Alabama, coverage of and commentary on King v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 2:27 pm
Recognizing its authority to affect general maritime law, the 11th Circuit sought out to establish new precedent on this issue. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:24 pm
Authorities have said nothing about how the gun went off. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
App. 1984); Jones v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am
Still, she asks about protections for sensitive data given to others–hospitals and the like. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:53 am
Jones, supra).State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 12:46 pm
The interest is further undermined by HHS’s statutory authority to grant religious exemptions to whomever it chooses—which HHS itself understands to include authority to grant such exemptions to for-profit businesses. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
In Chippewas of Mnjikaning First Nation v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am
The Court of Appeal rejected what it considered to be a suggestion by the appellants that there should effectively be a re-hearing of the issue of whether the discrimination was justified given that the right to appeal was on a point of law only under s.13(1), Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, noting the Supreme Court’s guidance on the dividing line between law and fact in R(Jones) v First-tier tribunal [2013] UKSC 19 (citing paragraph 16 of Jones). [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am
The Court of Appeal rejected what it considered to be a suggestion by the appellants that there should effectively be a re-hearing of the issue of whether the discrimination was justified given that the right to appeal was on a point of law only under s.13(1), Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, noting the Supreme Court’s guidance on the dividing line between law and fact in R(Jones) v First-tier tribunal [2013] UKSC 19 (citing paragraph 16 of Jones). [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 5:53 am
T.D., from Judge Jones in the Ocean County Family Part (the author of many published decisions in his tenure on the bench). [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:00 am
The Vanderbilt University D/B/A Vanderbilt University Hospital, et. al. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 10:00 am
Jones, 2013 U.S. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 10:45 am
Kreves v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 4:26 am
Crockett v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Havner, 953 S.W.2d 706, 716 (Tex. 1997) (holding, in accord with the weight of judicial authority, “that the requirement of a more than 50% probability means that epidemiological evidence must show that the risk of an injury or condition in the exposed population was more than double the risk in the unexposed or control population”); id. at at 719 (rejecting isolated statistically significant associations when not consistently found among studies) Silicone Cases Hall… [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 2:21 pm
Consent Decree (April 4, 2013); Mervin Jones v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 7:12 am
Johnson worked at Jones Day from 1994 to 2010. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 11:15 am
In its recent decision in the case of Jones v. [read post]
