Search for: "In Re Application of Fisher"
Results 81 - 100
of 322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2014, 7:35 am
July 11, 2014), decision available here.Players: Decision by Judge Morgan Christen, joined by Judge Fisher. [read post]
4 May 2023, 3:49 am
But that’s not what we’re talking about. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am
Mark Walsh provided us with a “view from the Courtroom,” while at Forbes Daniel Fisher looks at the big picture of yesterday’s decisions, focusing on “some surprising alignments” and “odd positions. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 3:29 pm
In re Wands, 858 F.2d 731, 735 (Fed. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
” (In an earlier ruling in the Fisher litigation, the Court had vacated the Court of Appeals’ decision because the lower court had required merely that the university’s use of race be in “good faith” and had not applied the proper narrow tailoring standard.)It is not obvious that deference to a university on the educational goals it is pursuing in considering applicants for admission (the issue in Grutter and Fisher) would unproblematically… [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:20 am
” Along with the consideration of race and these other factors, which are used to assign each applicant a Personal Achievement Index (PAI) score, the holistic program also takes into account an applicant’s Academic Index (AI) score, which is calculated based on the applicant’s standardized test scores, class rank, and high school coursework. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:29 pm
Fisher’s argument for respondents. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Every application is re- viewed first by an admissions office reader, who assigns a numerical rating to each of several categories. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Every application is re- viewed first by an admissions office reader, who assigns a numerical rating to each of several categories. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
In Fisher v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:50 am
The two cases are Fisher v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 11:58 am
It doesn’t require this Court to overrule Apodaca, whichJUSTICE SOTOMAYOR: We’re not required to do anything. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 10:55 am
Aug. 27, 2013), decision available here.Players: Decision by Judge Paez, joined by Judge Fisher. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 4:25 am
The Justices did not act on Fisher v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 2:03 am
Fisher-Price, Inc., 485 F.3d 1157, 1161 (Fed. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:27 pm
She wrote:[64] Re Eve [[1986] 2 SCR 388,] is not instructive about what “proof of incompetence” means. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 6:03 am
Monsanto, the Court considers the application of the doctrine of patent exhaustion to self-replicating technologies. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 5:21 pm
We're going to make sure that's fixed before we bring back up the applications (Lateral Tracker, etc.)] [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:21 pm
The South Florida Business Journal obtained a copy of the bank's dividend application. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:40 am
" Any information marked as "confidential" will not be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other applicable disclosure law. [read post]
